English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

people that firmly stand up for guns are saying THE EXACT THING that others are saying with the NUKES.

ITS NOT THE GUNS or NUKES, that are a problem. IT IS THE PEOPLE-(TERRORISTS) or CONTRIES THAT "USE" THEM. (pakistan & osama bin laden)

lets get serious, it's just wrong. You can't expect others to change if we don't.

Yep, guns and nukes are the same in this sense because the reasons are the same. Its NOT the tools but the people that use them......and thats just plain STUPID.

Remove them both from society!

THAT train of thought of "its not the tools" is what needs to change.
and taking the money from the arms dealers, and stop buying the PROPAGANDA, & nra magazines, and stop taking their money to get votes, thus stop the need for lobbyists money.

2007-07-21 02:42:21 · 10 answers · asked by schmidt50401 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

10 answers

Guns and nukes are not the same and no one with any common sense would try to claim that they are. The idea that if you ban guns that all murders would miraculously stop is idiotic. If a person wants to kill someone they will use a car, a baseball bat, poison, a knife, a machete or any of the other million things that can be used to kill.
It all boils down to the peson who has control of the object, whether that is a gun or a nuke or a car or a knife or the cleaning agents in the house, and their intentions.
This is for "the truth hurts"--If you are going to argue against the 2nd Amendment at least know what you are talking about. Specifically, automatic weapons require a specific license to purchase and own and sale...you can just decide to sell it without making sure the person who buys it has a license as well. If "Tom" did sell the automatic weapon he purchased on Tuesday then he would go to jail for violating the law.
The 2nd Amendment gives me the rigth to keep and bear arms. I have the right to protect myself and my family from the dregs of society who are out on the street because liberals feel that prison isn't the place for them because they were from a broken home or some other such BS. I will use a firearm if necessary to protect myself and my family. If you want to make society safer, start teaching morals and values in schools again. Start making parents take responsibilty for their children...fix the causes of the problem, don't try to take away my rights as an American.

Edit:
Have you noticed how everyone who doesn't agree with schmidt gets a thumbs down...it appears that only those left wing nuts are the only ones who can have an answer that is acceptable. It is a case of agree with me or else. So THANK YOU very much for my "thumbs down" I appreciate it...it shows me that I am on the right track!

2007-07-21 04:02:56 · answer #1 · answered by Tater1966 3 · 0 1

Just a few questions
1 How long does it take for the Police to respond to a call from you?
2 What you going to do for the 45 min to and Hour (average time)till they get there while the criminal is raping your wife or beating you with a a baseball bat.
3 Never tried hunting with a nuke Hows that work? does it cook the deer for you?
4 How do you target shoot with a nuke? guess it would be hard to miss now wouldn't it?
5 Do you really believe that when you outlaw guns all these people who are criminalswho by defination don't care about laws will turn in their guns because now they are illegal ?

Now Mr Truth Hurts a few points for you The 2nd add in a way was amended with the advent of fully automatic weapons , it been illegal to own then since about 1924 without a special license from the Gov't and BTW it ain't cheap. so this answer both questions about how the guy that killed mr jones got his weapon cuz it wasn't bought from some one who bought it legally and then sold it to some kid cuz the Gov't tracks full auto weapons. TRUTH HURTS DON'T IT

2007-07-21 04:10:32 · answer #2 · answered by trinslycan 5 · 0 1

Wow - i think of you're way off base there - it incredibly is liberal agencies like the ACLU, and the NAACP that help criminals... Org's like the ACLU who're worried approximately how we are treating terrorists, while those self same terrorists might kill them and you if that they had the prospect. agencies like this who're greater worried some murderers rights then American's protection. i've got confidence which you won't be in a position to blame weapons on crimes and homicide, if there we no longer weapons anymore there may be something else... if somebody desires to kill somebody they are going to locate a thank you to do it. Gun administration has continuously been a conservative stance because of the fact it incredibly caters to midsection united statesa. - ought to gun be greater regulated valuable - yet conservatives do no longer safeguard criminals EVER - it incredibly is the liberals jobs

2016-09-30 10:17:29 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Sounds as if you're preaching to the wrong choir...
"ITS NOT THE GUNS or NUKES, that are a problem. IT IS THE PEOPLE".
that's correct- IT IS THE PEOPLE...you wrote it; why don't you get it?
do you blame the pen when you write a bad check?
do you blame the car when you run out of gas?
do you see a trend here- these things are TOOLS: neither good nor bad. the idea of control is a good one, just direct it towards the person in control.

2007-07-21 04:25:18 · answer #4 · answered by sirbobby98121 7 · 0 1

The truth of (BOSNIAN) is that Bill Clinton done NOTHING for Bosnian. The truth is the real hero was (President Alija Izethbegovic), it was this man that stopped the blood from flowing in the streets in Bosnian.....The only thing Bill Clinton did was put troops in Bosnian after the fact....What the Ambassador says about Bill Clinton; "Bill Clinton is a 'COWARD', and the Ambassador also says for the America people to be aware of Bill Clinton, he wants to take guns away from the American people, and if Clinton does you will have blood flowing in the streets as Bosnian has." The Ambassador of Bosnian has (Nothing) good to say about the Democrat Politicians.

2007-07-21 02:55:07 · answer #5 · answered by ? 1 · 0 1

some people take advantage of the 2nd Amendment.

Just recently found out that if you own a gun and lose it or it's stolen.....you do NOT have to report it.

With that said, how do we know that person didn't just sell it?......then it somehow ends up in the hands of a juvenile delinquent who kills someone in a drive by.

and so on and so on.....................the second Amendment was written years ago when people used swords and muskets...........when society graduated to automatic weapons, that Amendment should have been revised.


until then.......innocent people will keep losing their lives.


About the NUKES.........every country out there wants to have them to "protect themselves"........funny thing though, because it only takes a few for world destruction.........what will they be "protecting" when everybody is dead?



to the person below me....the guy who shot mr. jones got his gun from "tom" who practiced his 2nd amendment right and bought 3 automatic weapons on tuesday.....he then fell on hard times and decided to sell one to the guy who shot mr. jones on friday.

the point is.....we can go on and on and on about this all day.....but if guns did not exist, less people would die/be killed.......but the guy who shot mr. jones(if guns did not exist) could have killed him with a knife just as well......you get my drift........stop acting like if people took away your right to bear arms that people would not still die innocently!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I understand honey...........the truth hurts doesn't it?

2007-07-21 02:55:41 · answer #6 · answered by WHOISTHEPUPPETMASTER? 5 · 0 2

I would like to give you a theoretical situation.
Someone breaks into Jones' home and threatens him with a gun. When Mr Jones panics and runs away, he is shot and killed.
I he had access to a gun, he could have defended himself.
But a recent law prevented him from owning a gun.
If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.

Do you have a response to my remarks? If not, it proves you wrong and who is stupid.

2007-07-21 02:57:49 · answer #7 · answered by fly by night 2 · 0 2

Another free thinking liberals trying to take out the 2ND amendment I see. I think if you feel our Constitution is something you cannot abide by, then it would be best for you to go to a country that better fits your needs.

2007-07-21 02:47:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Keep taking rights away and there will no rights.

2007-07-21 02:46:52 · answer #9 · answered by The Bride 1 · 2 1

What do bears have to do with it and why would you want to arm them?

2007-07-21 02:45:24 · answer #10 · answered by Yahoo Sucks! 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers