English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

But is it the right thing to sell all those evil to public in the name of commercialization/ making profit?

All governments in the World swears to protect its public while crowning but supports/ never de-promote those people who sell the evil for man kind

I feel that there should be one single law/system in the world ( at least to protect the next generations from diseases like cancer,liver diseases,etc) to control the production, manufacturing and selling the consumables to the man kind.

are there any such powerful global organizations in the world to protect the future of the mankind. If you know explain me clearly

2007-07-20 23:43:15 · 4 answers · asked by tourism researcher 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

4 answers

What's your point?

People constantly do things that may cause them harm. It is not government's place to protect them from their own folly.

2007-07-21 01:14:22 · answer #1 · answered by gunplumber_462 7 · 0 0

tobacco and alcohol can be a way to relax, despite all of the negative health effects. Alcohol can actually be beneficial depending on frequency of use and dosage.
It also gives people jobs. Sure there are a select few people at the top of the tobacco industry making ridiculous amounts of money, but think of all the farmers working fields, all of the people who pick the tobacco, people who work in the factories, and even the specialty shops that sell nothing but smoking products. Just because the government taxes it and it can be abused doesnt make it evil. It is a cash crop not food, but it still brings profit with exports giving America money that it so desperately needs. Many people say that they could just farm other things like food, but america is fat enough, and in reality there isnt enough demand to get a profit produce to make converting every tobacco field in the country, let alone the entire world.

people are dying from cancer, but its there choice. its nobody's choice to be unemployed and impoverished to the point of starvation.

2007-07-21 08:54:28 · answer #2 · answered by osoboricuoso 2 · 0 0

They don't want to cure cancers,do you know how much money is generated through the pharmaceutical companies.The alcohol,and tobacco industries can't hold a candle to those pharmaceutical firms and major hospitals,we are talking trillions of dollars annually.With that kind of money at stake they will never cure cancer,plus just think of all the Dr's and nurses and specialist who would be out of work.They would rather people get sick and die.Believe me money makes this world go around it isn't love that;s for sure.

2007-07-20 23:53:20 · answer #3 · answered by one10soldier 6 · 0 0

No, it's not morally right, but in the case of business where profit is the goal, then it is right since it serves that goal.

As far as I know, there is no such organization, and there probably never will be.

2007-07-20 23:53:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers