Presidency elections:politics of power or national consensus.?

Answer 1

politics of power

Answer 2

no doubt it is purely a politics.in a democratic india , politics is necessary.without politics there shall be no democracy.its a ood concept. but political parties & politicians are not concern over the spirit of politics.presidency election is a healty politics. a woman can do anything.It is mrs.sushma swaraj and others prevented sonia gandhi from becoming p.m. now the same mrs.sonia gandhi made mrs.prathibha patil as president candidate that is politics.i dont coment on these two politics. its a healthy politics.by enforcing it some body will cross the limits. that is inevitable.politics and pressure groups are the back bones for democracy. we cant expect national consensus on presidential election.politics is ood for our nation.but it must be healthy one.
one must think that president is not a rubber stamp. implidley he is havin veto power like witholding non-money bills for un-certain period or refer back policy. its a key point that the president is having discriationary power during appointment of prime minister and dissolution of loksabha. though art 74(1) restricts the president but president can enhance his power on the basis of provisions under oath.since he is the head of the state.
hence politics is takin vital role in the pre.....election.politics of power given by the people to our representitives.when power is there then goal will achieve easily. we are giving our national consensus only during parliamentry & assembly elections.rest will carried by our representitives. hence now durin presidential election there is only politics of power but not a national consensus. thank you

Answer 3

It is nothing but politics of power. National consensus a myth in India.

Answer 4

Are you still unknown about the corrupted power of political nexus?
We never be able to get a president like Dr. Kalam.

Answer 5

it's both coz u can read from the newspapers that all the political parties want that person who is very efficient in handling a coalition govt. and he/she must be adept at dirty power game. a president is noyhing but just a puppet in the hands of ruling party.

Answer 6

properly, Cracker, you have don it lower back. you have used a logical question, given Obama's management journey, to rigidity the left to respond as in case you had asked a query approximately Bush, or, in the event that they could no longer verify a thank you to try this, call you names. widespread Democrat good judgment. i've got regarded at your question thrice and for the existence of me i won't be able to discover the area approximately Bush. So, now on your question. Trusting the "boy ask your self" with national protection could be like putting a commencing up Explorer Scout in fee of the Joint Chiefs of team, or sending somewhat League pitcher up against the Yankees interior the worldwide sequence. it may be silly and irresponsible to declare the least. The boy is purely no longer waiting for any style of management place. no one on the left has been waiting to grant one concrete clarification why he has the audacity to even seek for this way of job that's so some distance above his information.

Answer 7

politics and power go hand in hand......they are power hungry.....presidency is not less......
national consensus...... 1 percent may be.......

Answer 8

Whoever makes the most money can campaign the most, campaigning= power.

Answer 9

power of politicians

Answer 10

politics for party