2007-07-20 19:19:53 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
that is an abolute fact. they are all royalty and with him fading out they can admit it. they also can amit to own hald the bush beer interest and making millions prior to ww2 in weapons financianing. ahhh, thjey didn't know what a whack job hitler was gonna turn out to be. but the germans and the windsors etc are all one big happy famiolyu and the bushes belong. royal president at last. now we can annex england and the british isles as new states. later we can annex cuba, too. when jughead croaks.
2007-07-20 19:25:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
To be cousins you have to share grandparents, so there would be a minimum of 4 in the first generation, 8 in the second, this would leave you with 32768 possible grandparents in 13 generations.
This being the case the 'once removed' is a bit superfluous don't you think?
Going on from that if we allow 25 years per generation, we have 13 * 25, we are talking of ancestors of about 325 years ago, say about 1682 when to say least records were minimal.
Unless of course you were 2 French explorers navigating the Mississippi and claiming Louisiana for France, or Charles 11 of Great Britain
So it was all a long time ago and whilst no doubt Prince Charles can trace his 'line' back, it seems unlikely that George W. can.
I suppose that you could work out the odds statistically, i.e. the total number of people, say in Europe at that time divided by 32768 however, does it really matter?
2007-07-20 19:47:43 · answer #2 · answered by DavidP 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
13th cousin once removed? I reckon Im Prince Charles 13th cousin ... with around a million other people. The numbers are astronomical, you need a mathematician to work that out
2007-07-20 19:24:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Could be I heard the Queen was related to George Bush.
2007-07-22 09:54:27 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, it's not true that George Bush is Prince Charles's 13th cousin once removed.
The only link between them is that they have both had their brains removed.
2007-07-20 21:20:59 · answer #5 · answered by Namlevram 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I had heard that they were distantly related - but don't know exactly to what extent (but 13th cousin once removed is certainly distant)
2007-07-20 20:54:01 · answer #6 · answered by LilyB7 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OMG can you even have a 13th cousin and how can you remove a cousin I dont understand
2007-07-20 20:26:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Thank heavens no.....I don't pity Charles for much but he would have my utmost sympathy should he have the misfortune of being related to a chimp
2007-07-21 09:13:06 · answer #8 · answered by TheatreFan 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bloody Shape shifters
2007-07-20 19:27:07 · answer #9 · answered by yaboo 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Who knows? I'm the great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandson of Lord Baltimore.
2007-07-20 19:28:20 · answer #10 · answered by Matt R 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋