No.
Why do libs think that "chief executive" means "activist?"
2007-07-22 01:34:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure he knows what the word "execute" means, but he has a big heart and does not want to execute them Dems for all their lies and witch hunts. Guess he figures, they will end up getting what they deserve in their next life.
2007-07-20 17:11:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think he's done a good job of executing! Everyone may not agree with the results that came, but he has proven he knows how to execute!
2007-07-20 17:13:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by jrd 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
NO! He executed his duty of office, and we are just fine, Thank You!!
He done what was best for the country!!
And if he had not, you probably would'nt be here right now, as most of the country would'nt.
2007-07-20 17:08:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes
2007-07-20 17:05:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I think he knew exactly what execute means, since hes just about executed everything within the constitution
2007-07-20 17:07:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by writersbIock2006 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
would you have tooken the oath if you knew the future of terrible events
2007-07-20 17:10:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by bricks22416 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes. It has more than one syllable so it confuses him. Watch his speeches almost every night on Letterman.
He said "I'm the decider". "I will stay in Iraq even if no one but my wife and my dog agree with me."
2007-07-20 17:08:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by lcmcpa 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
No more than Clinton not knowing what the meaning of sex is.
2007-07-20 17:09:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by ronkpaws 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
No.
2007-07-20 17:05:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by American Man 3
·
4⤊
2⤋