English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8QGF5700&show_article=1&image=large

Now we don't have to listen to all those people complain about Darfur or anywhere else in the world if he is elected.

<>

2007-07-20 08:52:44 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

4 answers

of course, as with any Presidential contender, you have to buy the whole package or none of it.


Now, with Obama you get sex education in kindergarden.


Isn't that a wonderful public benefit?


Any bets on whether it would be "bias-free" sex education??


:-)

2007-07-20 09:01:05 · answer #1 · answered by Spock (rhp) 7 · 0 1

If you actually read on in that article he says he still wants to keep some forces there.
Obama is so full of it.
But he is right on that point. We can't use genocide as an arguement to be there when there is genocide in darfur far worse than Iraq will ever have.
We shouldnt be there, and if you think obama is going to take us out, you are WRONG.

2007-07-20 16:03:19 · answer #2 · answered by Beauty&Brains 4 · 0 0

I don't know if he said that or not. Or if you are just trying to be an ***. But seriously I'm for any candidate that understands we need to worry about what going on in our own country before we go out and try to help others. While we are fighting wars and saving lives over sea's, home is falling apart.

2007-07-20 15:56:03 · answer #3 · answered by Shon 5 · 1 0

He thinks it is not a good reason to stay in Iraq, and neither do I. These crazy Muslims are going to start killing each other as soon as we leave, lets stop spending a fortune to stop the inevitable.

2007-07-20 15:55:50 · answer #4 · answered by Steve C 7 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers