English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

from Wikipedia:
This has been said to derive from the belief that English law allowed a man to beat his wife with a stick so long as it is was no thicker than his thumb. In 1782 Judge Sir Francis Buller is reported as having made this legal ruling. The following year James Gillray published a satirical cartoon attacking Buller and caricaturing him as 'Judge Thumb'. The cartoon shows Buller carrying two bundles of sticks and the caption reads "thumbsticks - for family correction: warranted lawful!"

2007-07-20 08:36:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

This has been said to derive from the belief that English law allowed a man to beat his wife with a stick so long as it is was no thicker than his thumb. In 1782 Judge Sir Francis Buller is reported as having made this legal ruling. The following year James Gillray published a satirical cartoon attacking Buller and caricaturing him as 'Judge Thumb'. The cartoon shows Buller carrying two bundles of sticks and the caption reads "thumbsticks - for family correction: warranted lawful!"

It seems that Buller was hard done by. He was notoriously harsh in his punishments, but there's no evidence that he ever made the ruling that he is infamous for. Edward Foss, in his authoritative work The The Judges of England, 1870, wrote that, despite a searching investigation, "no substantial evidence has been found that he ever expressed so ungallant an opinion".

It's certainly the case that, although British common law once held that it was legal for a man to chastise his wife in moderation (whatever that meant), the 'rule of thumb' has never been the law in England. Despite the phrase being in common use since the 17th century and appearing many thousands of times in print, there are no printed records that asspciate it with domestic violence until the 1970s. The false stories that assumed the wife-beating law to be true may have been influenced by Gillray's cartoon.

Even if people mistakenly believed that law to exist, there's no reason to connect the legal meaning with the phrase - which has been in circulation since at least 1692, when it appeared in print thus:

Sir W. Hope, Fencing-Master, 1692 - "What he doth, he doth by rule of Thumb, and not by Art."

That makes it clear that the origin refers to one of the numerous ways that thumbs have been used to estimate things - judging the alignment or distance of an object by holding the thumb in one's eye-line, the temperature of brews of beer, measurement using the estimated inch from the joint to the nail, etc. It isn't clear which of these is the precise origin and this joins the whole nine yards as a phrase that probably derives from some form of measurement but which is unlikely ever to be definitively pinned down.

2007-07-20 08:54:31 · answer #2 · answered by eelj 2 · 0 1

It's an old English custom from the days when men were allowed to beat their wives. The law said that they could not use a stick that was thicker than their thumb, hence the 'rule of thumb'.

2007-07-20 08:32:24 · answer #3 · answered by quatt47 7 · 1 1

The precise origin of 'rule of thumb' is not certain, but it seems likely to refer to the thumb as a rough measuring device.

2007-07-20 10:23:11 · answer #4 · answered by heklheraa 2 · 1 0

old english. means a man could not use a switch any thicker than his thumb to beat this wife ..

2007-07-20 08:46:20 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 0 1

Check out this site, it will answer your question completely.

http://dynamic.uoregon.edu/~jjf/essays/ruleofthumb.html

2007-07-20 08:32:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers