English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Please read this before answering.

Ive noticed more and more in the united states today, that we are losing our freedoms. But, as its already known, anarchy only works for a short time. Somalia being a perfect example, with no working government, Its a haven for killers, physically, and hatred, mentally. In the US, With this state, its a haven for MENTAL killers, and PHYSICAL hatred.

Is balance possible?

, the 13 year old philosopher.

2007-07-20 08:14:55 · 5 answers · asked by Marley Sunshine 2 in Politics & Government Government

5 answers

"a haven for MENTAL killers, and PHYSICAL hatred"?

Good try, but sometimes it is a better strategy to back away from the [Submit] button.

Keep reading. You sound like a smart kid, but you should reexamine the state of life in the United States. Living a free life under unprecedented prosperity and comfort can sometimes skew your perspective.

A good resource would be the public library. Read some papers from the Carter years for example. Though not always 100% accurate, the voice at the time is generally clearer than the spin decades later.

If you really want to get into what keep societies together, try http://www.mises.org.

2007-07-20 08:23:42 · answer #1 · answered by the_defiant_kulak 5 · 1 0

Anarchy only works where people are enlightened enough to operate out of respect of others, willing to let go of hatred and prejudice, and able to accept responsibility for their own actions and situations.

As a species, we're nowhere close. For an example of a society that does, read James P Hogans "Voyage from Yesteryear"

So the balance comes in being able to find a way to enforce laws that limit criminal harm to others, while still allowing maximum personal freedoms and civil liberties.

Check out the Libertarian party website. http://www.lp.org

2007-07-20 08:20:21 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1 0

well since anarchy has no form of govt so to speak, no it can not have a balance with the govt if govt dosent exist.

2007-07-20 08:23:02 · answer #3 · answered by skiracer712 4 · 0 1

Jimi was the man. lo!

2007-07-20 08:52:45 · answer #4 · answered by Steel Rain 7 · 0 0

What freedoms have you lost?

2007-07-20 09:38:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers