English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

cause for every building they take down, we take down one of thier country's..... they can't be that dumb... can they,,, Bush has a hair line trigger finger....

2007-07-20 07:58:16 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

19 answers

I agree, Osama, already got the target he was after for decades.
I doubt they would even attack new york again, unless it is by boat laden with explosives cruising into the harbor.

2007-07-20 08:25:23 · answer #1 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 0 2

This can be a difficult qestion. it's according to your definition of a 'terrorist attack.' It seems that Major Nidal Malik Hasan was against American troops being in the Middle East; in this case, he had no right being in the Military. However, I can't say that his actions was that of a terrorist; I think his grievance was personal and he acted alone. On the other hand, if you would class the action of Timothy James McVeigh, or the Christian guy who who killed the abortion doctor as a terrorist, then Major Hasan should also be under the same heading.

2016-05-18 04:22:46 · answer #2 · answered by joanne 3 · 0 0

I would never second guess a terrorist.
If they had the chance, they'd hit us any were.
Remember,9/11 was the second attempt.
Since 9/11 NYS and the Canadian border police have nabbed multiple terrorist trying to cross into NY.
In Watertown they busted a truck load of explosives 2 days before new years 2004, busted 6 Arab youths in Buffalo, planning attacks.Etc.

2007-07-20 08:09:25 · answer #3 · answered by NEOBillyfree 4 · 0 2

I don't fear an attack, so I guess I don't expect it.

I don't think it has anything to do with Bush taking down their countries.

I think it has a lot to do with some very fine counter terrorism measures put in place my Mike Bloomberg, WITHOUT the Fed's help.

2007-07-20 08:08:15 · answer #4 · answered by Incognito 5 · 0 0

New York is not next on the list that was their first objective, more than likely it will be San Francisco or Los Angeles or maybe some other big city like Seattle rest assured they will attack us again

2007-07-20 08:08:12 · answer #5 · answered by plhudson01 6 · 0 0

Until Bush gets his head out of the clouds and starts actually FIGHTING terrorism. I'd say it's more likely more than just a possibility.

2007-07-20 08:05:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Supposedly, lightening never strikes in the same place twice. Terrorism can, and will. Look at the WTC 1993 and 2001(9/11).

2007-07-20 08:02:29 · answer #7 · answered by James S 4 · 0 1

Dumb? Bush's actions have boosted the membership of Al-Qaeda 10000% Bin Laden thought he was going to get nuked and he's laughing at Bush's ineptitude.

2007-07-20 08:03:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Terrorists didnt take down the WTC buildings in the first place, so why would they try now

google video search - 9/11 Mystery

2007-07-20 08:04:50 · answer #9 · answered by Abaddon Rising 3 · 0 3

I'm always on alert in NYC. I recently reported a guy who had all the earmarks of a suicide bomber on the subway. You never know. We're not safe and may never be safe again.

2007-07-20 08:01:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers