What do you think of Keith Olbermann's Special Comment last night?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19859124/
2007-07-20 05:35:30 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
So I ask for "intelligent Responses Only" and I get bashing from the right-wingers. Go figure.
2007-07-20 05:42:36 · update #1
Shows what a kook he is.
2007-07-20 05:39:20 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 6⤊ 6⤋
As usual, Keith was full emotion, but full of facts. Unlike his counterpart Rush Limbaugh who is usually just full of hot air. . Olbermann is more proof that there is NO Liberal Media. If there was, there would be many more like him. Unfortunately, there isn't. He is one of the very few that is man enough to stand up for what he believes and is trying to help this country. Unlike Sean Hannity, Olbermann actually is a Great American.
If Bush had to go to Iraq and fight, we all know there would never have been a war.
2007-07-20 05:56:40 · answer #2 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
He said what he said in an articulate manner. Or should I say he "read what he read in an articulate manner". I used to enjoy his show(even if I didn't always agree), but now that NBC has chosen to be a mouthpiece for the far-left viewpoint, I don't respect it as much. He only has guests who espouse the same, or similar views. There's no give and take of differing views of the subject so it gets tiresome. MSNBC is trying for higher ratings(they re in the cellar)and this is the tack they're taking. Also, the childish bashing of the opposition(O'Reilly)is not professional, in my opinion.
2007-07-20 05:53:40 · answer #3 · answered by amazin'g 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think he was right on target. President Bush proclaimed that it is unacceptable to think, to challenge, to question what we are doing and where these actions are taking us.
Recently retired from the Navy, I saw the erosion with my own eyes while living and traveling in Europe. Currently living in South America, I see we are losing the battle for hearts and minds here as well. The only clout we have is with the dollar which we use to buy friends, however temporary they may be.
Bottom line. Our credibility around the world is tarnished with both our friends and our enemies.
2007-07-20 05:53:37 · answer #4 · answered by mitscherman 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Have a real long annoying look on the equipment the US has maximum suitable now. at the start, Obama shouldn't usher in extensive-unfold healthcare. He needs to make coverage greater accessible to all. 2nd, of path extensive-unfold wellbeing-disguise sucks. that's the reason we in Western Europe have it. we expect of, hmm, our healthcare equipment sucks. i comprehend, we could shop it. i assume that's the comparable with Japan and Canada to boot. actuality - america of a spends greater on healthcare in keeping with individual than the different usa on earth. actuality - the US has greater demise expenditures for toddlers elderly decrease than 5 than western eu countries with extensive-unfold wellbeing coverage. meaning that a lifeless American 4 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous would have had a greater applicable hazard of existence in the event that they have been born in Canada, France, Cuba, Germany, Japan etc, all of that have extensive-unfold wellbeing coverage.
2017-01-21 11:05:13 · answer #5 · answered by huhn 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The man is a ranting lunatic. The President has already been to Iraq many times since the beginning of the war, but he is not a foot-soldier. He is the commander-in-chief. Typically, the CINC doesn't pick up a rifle and go to the front. Does this moron Olberman know anything about the military except how he hates it.
2007-07-20 05:46:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I think he's absolutely right. It's scapegoating at it's finest. The Bush Administration pays staffers to come up with scapegoats for each and every one of their mistakes on a daily basis, i.e. Karl Rove, and they pay them/him muchas moolah for it. It's disgusting and the people who fall for it are just simple minded folk who believe what they're told without doing their own independent research.
2007-07-20 05:43:21 · answer #7 · answered by Eisbär 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I clapped my hands and stomped my feet... that's how I felt about it.
Then I sat down and asked myself... is this what its come to? Fight fire with fire? I am so disgusted by one extreme that I am gravitating toward another? It makes me wonder.
2007-07-20 05:55:47 · answer #8 · answered by Bon Mot 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Keith Olbermann is a washed up ESPN has been. A complete tool!!
Sorry, can't provide an intelligent response when the questions subject matter (Kieth Olbermann) is so retarded
Hey, at least I apologized!
2007-07-20 05:39:39 · answer #9 · answered by J S 3 · 2⤊ 7⤋
It makes me wonder how long he'll survive after Bush is out of office. Goodness, what will he have to talk about.. :)
Just like any other program, people tend to tune in to what they want to hear.
2007-07-20 05:43:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
It was a good rant. He expresses his opinions well.
I didn't agree with a lot of the content (and I'm a fan of his show) but he did express what he wanted to say effectively.
2007-07-20 05:38:54 · answer #11 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋