She is a socialist.
2007-07-20 05:39:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jeƒƒ Lebowski 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Honestly, because there is so very much to despise! She wants socialist health care, she wants to take profits away from companies who do have employees by the way. She wants the government to tell you how to raise your children, and well the answer goes on and on and on and on. There really isn't enough time or space to cover all the ills of Hillary Clinton. She is a communist, or socialist, or fascist. However, you want to look at it. She is not for freedom and she is anti military. She is a walking, breathing joke!! A top notch hypocrite and a very very good liar! She wants people to believe that she really truly cares about you when in reality she could care less! She is power hungry and will say and do anything to have all the power she can muster. Think about it, why would any one individual spend over 100 million dollars to have a job that only pays $400,000 a year!? And if the dems out there truly think that she stayed with Bill after his humiliating affairs in the White House and before, is because she deeply loves him. That is truly laughable and I feel deeply sorry for you and your small minds. I can not believe that people are so ignorant that they would vote for such a vicious woman! Bill and Hillary do not even live together!!? It is all a front to convince people that she is good. She is not!! Their marriage is a matter of political convenience and that is it!! She is pure evil and will completely destroy this country! Look at the damage she has already done to the state of New York!!? Anyways, I have gone on too much eventhough I could most definitely go on more. In closing, she has ice in her veins, and would ditch Bill in a New York minute if she thought it would get her the Presidency. I too would be proud to vote for such a fine American as Fred Thompson!! Thank You
2007-07-20 13:00:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by RubyUnicorn 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
This question is like asking if the cup is half full or half empty! In my estimation she is both; half full of it and running on half empty. The benefit of her in office is the advice and support she would get from Bill (and that will need to be closely monitored). Hillary started her campaign with "I want to be the first lady president", is that the motivation we need in office? She has a strong tendency (as do they all) to say what she thinks we want to hear or say it in such a way we think we heard her say it. She voted for the Iraq war without even reading the intelligence reports - how can any politician send people to their death without studying the information available to them? I hope our military people in Iraq have an opportunity to respond to this question!
2007-07-20 14:01:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by privateeye4U 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
What is NOT so bad about Shillary Rotten Clinton? I can think of at least a few major reasons not to vote for her:
1. Supports socialist policies, such as taking profits from private industries.
2. Supported the Kennedy-Bush-McCain immigration bill in spite of 80% of the American people opposing it.
3. Constantly shifts positions on the war in Iraq, depending on which is most popular and her audience (The term is "flip-flopping").
4. Supports government censorship including that of the failed Fairness Doctrine (a clear violation of the first ammendment).
5. Like most democrats, supports raising taxes on middle and upper-class citizens; redistribution of wealth (again, socialism).
2007-07-20 12:48:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Firestorm 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Hillery is not so bad.
We aren't ready for a female president. There is one thing that I think I'm remembering. Didn't she work on the Health problem the first of Bill's years in office! She used a lot of $$$$ and didn't get anywhere. She knows the ropes but I don't want to see how many other issues get by her.
2007-07-20 12:42:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by plyjanney 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Cons have done their best to demonize Hillary since she is the #1 Democrat and most likely the democratic candidate, they call her a communist, say she will rip the country apart, yet for some reason they can't explain why her husband ran the country for 8 years and did a fine job, including eliminating the deficit which fiscally irresponsible cons immediately brought back.
2007-07-20 12:38:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
She has the opposite personality from Bill. Bill is a likeable guy although I didn't like most of his political decisions. Hillary is an opportunist. She talks to her audience and gives them what they want to hear; she is totally devoid of principles. She stood by and defended her husband for her own political expediency. This is why so many, liberals and conservatives can't stand her.
2007-07-20 12:52:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by tobi 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
she's gotta really big butt. that and he vision of what government should be. my problem with the extreme left, (even with the cute butted ones), is their hypocracy. man-o-man, don't they know exactly what we all need and how we should all live
think about her kids book, "it takes a village". well there you go. i think it takes a mama and a daddy. but according to the left that is now an absurd concept. and the solution is turning everything over to the village, including the individuals independence....
while i agree 100% with her that we have to deal with meaningful health crae, i cannopt buy into the lefts basic philosophies...that and her butt....
2007-07-20 12:42:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I have no clue. I think she did GREAT her first 8 years in office, ha ha!
Seriously, the government is still a good ol boys club, and is very threatened by a strong, intellegent, moralistic female.
Go figure.....
2007-07-20 12:42:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by JLea 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Everything she stands for has a socialist/communist slant to it. For her to be elected would endanger our way of life with the threat that we may become a socialist state, and possibly down the road, communist.
2007-07-20 12:38:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Aside from the fact that she is a socialist communist who is totally immoral and self-centered?
Nothing... she is as good as the next tyrant.
2007-07-20 12:41:59
·
answer #11
·
answered by Zee HatMan 3
·
1⤊
2⤋