Knowing he was put in office by the KKK and was a member
and is the only Senator left who did not sign the civil rights
admendment. Should he have made that speach or should
someone else have made it?
2007-07-20 05:11:53 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Whatever his politics in the past, I think that Senator Byrd's speech does ring true about dog fighting being a problem. No human or animal should be made to shed blood for another's entertainment!!!
I only hope that his compassion comes in some part from mistakes made in the past. Times and opinions have changed since the civil rights movement.
2007-07-20 05:56:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He can barely string a coherent sentence together in my opinion. And a former member of the Klan who committed acts of violence against other Americans is not the most credible person to speak out against someone committing violence against animals.
2007-07-20 05:30:35 · answer #2 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dang good question.
just sitting here wondering what a 'speach' is...
2007-07-20 05:16:22 · answer #3 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't listen to the doddering old sonofabitch.
2007-07-20 06:23:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's still able to talk???
2007-07-20 05:17:31 · answer #5 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋