Please explain why for us all;
When theres absolutely no progress in IRAQ's governement
While Al Queda is only getting stronger elsewhere(pakistan)
While a new Al Queda group is developing in IRAQ because of our occupation there
When we never truly went after Bin Laden, instead went after Saddam
When there was not a connection between Saddam and al queda until after we arrived and Saddam was already captured, and only grew because of the kaos left with an unprepared plan that everyone conceeds to.
Why, why do you still believe in this war????
2007-07-20 04:58:42 · 13 answers · asked by writersbIock2006 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
FACTS FACTS FACT ONLY please.
Enlighten us if you can.
And if you say ebcause the terrorist will come over here, when we leave -- I say they have already regrouped and are stronger now.
Even Pentagon says that
2007-07-20 04:59:38 · update #1
LIL me -- I need facts....
this is all about the facts.
Pentagon reports...IRAQI government updates....
apparently you arent truly follwoing the progress of our failure in IRAQ asclosely as you shoudl, and merely want to throw out a give me facts...in attempt to discredit the statemnet -- but anyone knows this is PUBLIC RECORD NOW...
2007-07-20 05:15:37 · update #2
Because they believe Bush still today that Saddam was connected to 911 and he actually had WMD's. Its really sad that these people don't understand what this war was really all about. Just a little reading on war and economics can clear this up real quick, but alas they won't open their minds.
2007-07-20 05:07:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
It's people like 'bushonlysubmale' that should have been sent over to Iraq on the front lines. If you honestly believe Iraq had ANYTHING whatsoever to do with 9/11 then you should have been one of 'its' victims because you're not intelligent enough to live a normal life with the rest of us.
Bush is without doubt one of the two great failures of this country (along w/ Madison and the War of 1812). That will not change. History will not look back with any different perspective than we have now. Virtually nobody questions the validity and honor of our place in World War II. Vietnam and Iraq, however, are another story. They were failures, they were dishonorable, and they were despicable. They are cheered by rednecks, Christian zealots, and general uneducated people.
It's not about whether you agree with the war on terrorism--that is a completely separate issue than the war in Iraq. Simple fact. We could have used Saddam Hussein as an ally against Bin Laden. Newsflash--he HATED Bin Laden. The enemy of my enemy is my friend, regardless of his own character. Churchill (a leader Bush couldn't amount to if he was given the power of God to do so) himself said it best: I'd make a deal with the devil to defeat Hitler; in regards to his alliance w/ Stalin. You can't afford to judge people's actions against their own people when you have another foe who wants to wipe you out. These are the things great leaders understand. These are the things Bush will never understand.
2007-07-21 07:08:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I still believe in Bush. War is a dirty job and everyone has an opinion on it. As the President, and leader of North America Bush made the choice to go to war. Americans should support this choice. If anyone is to blame for making Bush look bad, it is the American people. This country is split into so many pieces that it would be hard for anyone to step in as president and get support from the entire country. The point is, Bush is trying to win a war to protect our freedom and he has no support from Americans and the Democrats are making it even harder. If Bush had support the job would get done faster and better. Without support it's like he's fighting two wars.
2007-07-20 05:29:55 · answer #3 · answered by Josh 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Its not a query of the Republicans believeing George Bush. while you're status there thinking if the different republicans are believing Bush, they're all status up there thinking in case you will have self assurance him. all of them wish you do.
2016-10-22 04:06:19 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would bet that half of the 28% that still back him
THINK IRAQ HAD SOMETHING TO DO WITH 9-11
here is Mr. Bush speaking about THAT
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/08/21/bush-on-911/
2007-07-20 05:07:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I believe he exists.
I believe he has violated federal laws. But that's just based on his own lawyers admitting he has, and on the Supreme Court concluding he has.
I believe that Congress never declared war. And the congressional legislative record backs me up on that.
I believe the Congress did authorize the use of military force, and is now too ineffectual and feckless to stand up as a co-equal branch of govt and put an end to it.
And I believe he just declared a coup [see link below] by asserting that the executive branch is superior to all other branches, and not subject to any legal sanctions under the law.
2007-07-20 05:04:04 · answer #6 · answered by coragryph 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
I still beleive in Bush how ever the congress is a differant story.If You Dont fight to the end in war you can not win!!!This war was 20 years past due.
2007-07-20 05:12:30 · answer #7 · answered by john 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because Bush followers are mindless blinded robots, programmed to spew the same vitriol over and over.
2007-07-20 05:03:08 · answer #8 · answered by baldiebear75 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
homer simpson and the last 7 republicans left in the usa
2007-07-20 05:02:46 · answer #9 · answered by canada1usa0 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Nice question, but there's one mistake: you asked for facts, and you're not going to get any, sadly.
2007-07-20 05:02:14 · answer #10 · answered by guess 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋