English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/topstories/*http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070720/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_us_troops
Honestly she more consered w/ herself than the saftey of the troops.

2007-07-20 04:37:24 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

She is a Marxist, Leninist, Stalinist, Commie Socialist. Her lover is Kim Jong IL. No one has the right to military secrets. That is just insane.
Notice how she says, "WHEN I am elected..." and not, "IF I am elected...."

Be afraid. BE VERY afraid. I would vote for my refrigerator before I would ever vote for her.

2007-07-20 04:46:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Funny how this administration doesn't want our OTHER elected officals to know about Iraq
BUT
THEY LEAK INFO ABOUT OUR CIA AGENTS

Articla doesn't say anything about Sen Clinton

BUT
it does say the same stuff we've been hearing for 5 years
give us more time

last night I watched clips of Bush in 03 saying "we have killed or captured 50% of AlQueda's leaders"
then 2 or 3 months later he said "we have killed or captured 2/3 of AlQueda's leaders"
then six months later we get "we have killed or captured 75% of AlQueda's leaders"

NOW we get the truth
Al Queda is AS strong or Stronger today than it was on 9-11

Gee George bad at math too?
I mean gees what are you good at

2007-07-20 11:45:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

'the safety of the troops'

That's pretty funny considering that this administration has been wrong about everything so far, and continues to leave our troops in harms way.

There were no WMD's.

The iraqi's didn't greet us as liberators (and still don't).

No planning for an insurgency.

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 in the first place.

Bin Laden still loose.

Al Queda and popular support for terrorist groups worldwide at all time high.

US credibility at an all time low.

Thanks guys - especially the ones who support this fiasco.

2007-07-20 11:45:11 · answer #3 · answered by Joe M 2 · 2 2

The american people have every right to know what comes out of Iraq since we are paying for it in lives and $$$

As a senator she is entitled to that information.. Plus Bill gets all the info he wants as a former Pres, so she could just get it from him..

2007-07-20 11:44:31 · answer #4 · answered by Jason 3 · 2 3

whats so secret about the military. Every member of congress should be given access to any military information, as long as it does not put our men and women in uniform in harms way.

2007-07-20 11:45:13 · answer #5 · answered by Daniel R. 4 · 2 2

She has the right to ask for them - but they shouldn't have to give them to her. There is a reason why our military has secrets. She needs to stop acting like she's already been elected President.

2007-07-20 11:41:45 · answer #6 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 3 2

Senator Richard Lugar, a Republican, asked for the same info.....this is just partisan bullcrap...she is on the Armed Services committee

2007-07-20 11:44:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

who does she think she is?

She wants to change rules that have been in place for years so she can have secrets.

She probably would exploit it to use for her campaign some how, she always finds a way. She would probably use against her own country with those secrets too.

2007-07-20 11:43:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

No! She may be on the Senate intelligence committee and this and that, but President Bush should crackdown on info coming out of Iraq. The American people have no right to know.

2007-07-20 11:41:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

a right? check the constitition (remember that piece of paper) -- but for Madame Hillary (remember the Rose Law firm papers) she can't keep a secret.. no she should not have anything other than cookie receipes stuck in her pants suit pockets

2007-07-20 11:42:03 · answer #10 · answered by John K 2 · 4 3

fedest.com, questions and answers