Since 9/11, there has been no single bigger threat to national security than the intentional leak of an active CIA operative. In a "time of war", no less.
That the persons responsible will go unpunished, while hundreds of people are being held indefinitely as "threats to national security" without specific charges being brought against them, is the height of hypocrisy.
2007-07-20 04:30:58 · 10 answers · asked by guess 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I find the whole thing disgusting. The fish rots from the head down.
2007-07-20 04:36:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
PLAMES case was thrown out because of a law written by congress that frees FEDERAL WORKERS from lawsuits -- the judge himself stated clearly it was not tossed out on merit, and even conceeded that there was some wrong doing here.
But his hands were tied by the law
GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT
Thanks for showing us whats wrong with america -- too many people just want to speak out..and not enough truly know the facts
2007-07-20 05:18:16 · answer #2 · answered by writersbIock2006 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nobody who follows the law is surprised.
The judge didn't rule on a partisan basis. In fact, the judge said that her claim appears to have merit.
The judge ruled on a procedural matter, based on a 2003 or 2004 law that granted immunity to govt officials from civil suits of this kind.
The judge was following the law. Not playing politics.
I wish people would trying to make this a partisan issue.
2007-07-20 04:35:40 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
yes...Richard Armatage who admitted leaking the name of the "non-covert paper pusher from Langley..IS going unpunished...while libby who did not leak the name of the "non-covert paper pusher from Langley" is punished...at least this judge did the right thing in throwing this lame case out...old fitzgerald should be tried for ignoring the fact that armatage admitted leaking the name of the
2007-07-20 04:40:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm not surprised. And you should be surprised that liberals support flag burning. Do you not have any respect for our flag? Thay can protest themselves in any way they want too.
2007-07-23 02:34:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I suggest you look at why it was thrown out before you fire off. The judge dismissed on jurisdictional grounds. That means her lawyers filed in the wrong court. There was no ruling on the merits or lack of merit of her lawsuit. It can be refiled in the proper jurisdiction.
Next time ask questions before you shoot rather than shooting first and asking questions later.
2007-07-20 04:35:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Your very confused and totally ignore the facts.
2007-07-20 09:01:28 · answer #7 · answered by Steel Rain 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not surprised. It was a bullshit case to begin with. Notice that everyone EXCEPT the person that actually "leaked" the information was listed on it?
2007-07-20 04:34:10 · answer #8 · answered by BDZot 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
LOL....You still believe there was a "real" leak here? LOL......the bigger threat is people like you who are this gullible.
2007-07-20 04:33:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
and her husband should be arrested for lying -- like we did not know who or what she was doing -- and him, he makes me sick -- all the money that was spent on this stupid action for n o t h i n g!!
2007-07-20 04:36:33 · answer #10 · answered by John K 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋