http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6786106,00.html
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=3127
Bush's new executive order is very ambiguous in its wording. What guarantees that this will actually be used to fight "terrorism"?
2007-07-20 03:57:34 · 6 answers · asked by xoil1321321432423 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Actually, Congress passed that law in 2003....
The order is only slightly vague, since it references the statute and the statute sets much clearer limits.
And the 5th Amendment Takings clause isn't implicated, because all he can do is freeze funds. Any actual taking still requires a trial.
2007-07-20 04:11:32 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The age old cry of the tyrant is law an order......you fig-er that one
2007-07-23 06:28:10 · answer #2 · answered by harold. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That clown is still in office is a wonder! As Americans we should impeach him and all his cronies ASAP. I don't know about you but I WANT MY COUNTRY BACK!!!
2007-07-20 05:27:58 · answer #3 · answered by Mary W 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The fifth isn't going anywhere. Spend less time surfing the internet and read the constitution. http://www.constitution.org/constit_.htm
2007-07-20 06:00:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I hope that its replaced by something better.
2007-07-22 14:56:51 · answer #5 · answered by Nakrome1515 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what a dork..........I still can't believe that he is in office............Is it 2008 yet?
2007-07-20 04:07:56 · answer #6 · answered by Barbo 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋