"The far-Right party’s candidate there captured a respectable share of the vote: 8.9 per cent.
...Labour has little to cheer about either – apart from the mere fact of having held on...
Labour’s vote fell by 14.1 points in Sedgefield and by 7.3 points in Southall. In Sedgefield Labour’s share of the vote was only 44.8 per cent, in Southall only 41.5 per cent.
In neither place does Labour now have an overall majority.
The only party to make more than derisory gains was the Liberal Democrats who were up 8.0 points in Sedgefield and 3.2 points in Southall... even the Liberal Democrats failed to come within hailing distance of victory in either.
The swing in their favour from Labour was 11.1 per cent in Sedgefield and 5.3 per cent in Southall."
Voters have seen through the Leftist hyperbole and lies as BNP clearly demonstrated to be a legitimate, viable party.
They and LibDems have your interests at heart and only the chronically self-delusional would now trust Labour or Tory
Thoughts?
2007-07-20 03:49:25 · 15 answers · asked by B.o.B 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Uncle Joe- any explanations why your avatar is a mass murderer of at least 40 million Russians and Jews?
2007-07-20 06:19:12 · update #1
A good day for britain.
Not total victory yet,but Rome wasnt built in a day.
There are still many ignorant ,blinkered ,loony left whites who will never recognise the problem until it dircetly affects them.
There are still 11 million immigrants.
There are still millions of schooleavers ,brainwashed with new labour spin.
However,britain is waking up.People are becoming more vocal,daring to say out loud.We need a government that believes in free speech and nationalism.
BNP,BNP,BNP
2007-07-20 04:28:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 9⤋
Interesting that you mention the merits of the Lib Dems & BNP despite that they believe in completely different things. They still lost though. Are things really gonna change so drastically over the next few years that they'll be a BNP MP? I wouldn't think so. Any intelligent minded voter would know not to vote for a fascist anti-democratic party
2007-07-20 11:40:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
They got the votes as a protest that nothing is being done to deal with the huge immigration problem we have here in the UK.
They were absolutely nothing to do with anyone supporting the BNP.
2007-07-20 03:54:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
Labour kept that By Election very quiet hoping we wouldn't notice the poor showing in our departed ex Pm's constituency.
2007-07-20 10:31:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
So the BNP didn't get elected in sedgefield?
So thats not one single representative in..
Westminister..
Wales..
Scotland..
Europe.
?
Out of 800 or 900 seats the BNP doesn't possess a single one.......after 25 years?
Time to give up perhaps?
2007-07-20 03:53:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 11⤊ 1⤋
The BNP managed to scoop up some of the anti-Labour protest vote. Big deal.
They always get slaughtered at general elections and will certainly be gubbed again next time around.
2007-07-20 06:14:04 · answer #6 · answered by Huh? 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Voters in both areas know no other politics but Labour. They would vote for a red elephant is it had a labour badge.
2007-07-20 04:01:31 · answer #7 · answered by john 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Oh my golly gosh! Anyone want to buy my corner shop in Sedgefield?
2007-07-20 03:59:39 · answer #8 · answered by Mityr Binesderty 2 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but cut the crap, who actually won the election? Come on, spell it out? What you are trying to put a spin on is the simple fact that you got less than ten percent of the vote and LOST!
BNP : No MPs. No Councils. No Hope!
2007-07-20 03:52:57 · answer #9 · answered by Avondrow 7 · 9⤊ 3⤋
Yes. It is sad though, that there are still enough people out there who would vote for a donkey if it had the word Labour in its name.
2007-07-20 05:49:44 · answer #10 · answered by Veritas 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋