Yes, because they would be part of "the party" and have all the luxuries, while the rest of us would be the poor proletariat. Members of "the party" are entitled to have more than the proles because they are the smart ones telling us how to run our lives and we should be grateful.
Socialism, Communism, Nazis (National Socialist), Slavery, it's all different words for the same thing: the theft of freedom.
Liberals do not believe in freedom. If they did, they would make participation in government programs (social security, welfare, medicare, etc.) a choice instead of mandatory. Mandatory participation is (by definition) oppression and slavery, how can any American support it?
2007-07-20 04:10:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Aegis of Freedom 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Considering people only think I am a liberal, but I'm much more extream then that to tell you the truth.
I don't like the thought of that, b/c then the people in government might take "extra" and live the fat cat life STILL.
H3ll, no I don't want anyone managing what I get.
Yes, I would like food, clothing, and shelter, but not at the expense of the State and regulations.
I don't like Free Market Capitalism, and I do not like the State.
So there's my answer.
2007-07-20 15:43:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Am 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe Marx talked about this. Russia tried it and look how it worked out for them.
I believe that the liberals or democrats or whatever you want to call them (I call them intelligent, thinking people) just want a president who has a brain, some sense of honor about the principles that this country was founded on and one who will bring the country back together politically.
2007-07-20 11:11:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by slykitty62 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sorry Charlie Brown but the Bush government could not possibly afford to pay our bills since they have placed Gas, Energy products, Food, Drugs, Hospital and Health Care and Insurance protection completely out of our reach as it is!
grow up!
2007-07-20 11:05:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Liberal whack jobs would be ecstatic. The average democrat would be left wondering what the hell happened to our party.
2007-07-20 15:28:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by archkarat 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, the part about an "equal share" will turn them off. After all, some people are more equal that others! So they'd want to be the ones who divvy up the loot and decide who deserves how much.
2007-07-20 10:55:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Eukodol 4
·
5⤊
4⤋
No I think we should just let conservatives not pay taxes and the rest of us will just sent them monthly payments for roads, military, water, power for traffic lights, police, fire etc. without all of us together throwing in on it. Liberals are the same people that fight for wages so you can pay those taxes. Taxes are an investment in your country, don`t you love your country? I love using that flag waving crap back at em.
2007-07-20 10:57:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
Liberals would be VERY happy. Afterall, if Shillary Clinton is any indication, socialism IS their ideal form of government.
2007-07-20 10:58:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Firestorm 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Well, if you threw in my green fees and travel to golf courses I would be for it. WooHoo.....No work.
BTW would the government also provide hookers?
2007-07-20 10:53:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by ken 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
that's funny...look at all the posts by conservatives affirming how liberals feel...
get a life ppl.
2 points.
2007-07-20 11:05:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋