Sunday evening on Bruce Dumont's 'Beyond The Beltway' , a nationally syndicated talk show , we got an earful from Barak Obama's Campaign advisor Pete Giangreco .
As the panelists were discussing the threat from Radical Islamists , a 92yr old D-Day veteran called-in to express his concern about the expansionist nature of Radical Islam and the forthcoming threat of more attacks on U.S. soil . After another panelist made his comment , Pete Giangreco took his turn . Mr. Giangreco , Barak's campaign advisor and a professor of journalism at Columbia College , tried to divert the discussion from the Radical Islamists threat , and said the following . . . "But you know Muslims didn't blow up the building in Oklahoma City or send anthrax through the mail . Those were , you know , some of Dan's people(referring to another panelist who is a Conservative) here . ... . . . . Those were Right-Wingers " .
Oh really , I thought nobody has been caught or charged with the Anthrax scare ???
Continue
2007-07-20 03:42:43 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Truth be told , he lied . And he lied to spin the story into making people believe that Conservatives were responsible for the Anthrax scare . He also obviously pandered hatred for Conservatives as a whole because 1 or 2 a$$holes did a stupid dastardly deed in Oklahoma .
They were not part of us , they were nuts and murderers(McVeigh and the other guy who helped him) .
Should we check the political affiliation of murderers in the inner city and blame the Democratic Party or supporters just because most inner city people do vote Democratic ? Of course not .
This is dangerous . This is subversive . And this will not do !!
Who would still vote for Obama after learning that he still pays and retains Giangreco as an advisor ?
What do you think of this egregious statement by Giangreco ?
2007-07-20 03:47:39 · update #1
Loftitright - Read your own statement . You basically just said that it's quite alright to have paid advisors who promote hatred and lies as long as they're not your biggest or most prominent advisor . That sir , is crazy .
2007-07-20 04:02:57 · update #2
If I were part of Obama's campaign, I'd keep quiet about radical churches - considering the one Obama attends.
PS Thanks for kind words! Back at ya, for sure. :)
2007-07-20 03:48:51 · answer #1 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 9⤊ 3⤋
They have spinned it through their blogs that Bush had the WTC wired to blow up and had this all planned ahead of time. The ultra liberals in the is country want socialism so bad, they are willing to sell their souls to the Devil to get it.
Nothing surprises me any more. I watch the far fringes of both sides, the ultra liberals and the ultra conservatives. Neither group have been known to use common sense or even have an IQ above 35.
2007-07-20 11:36:37 · answer #2 · answered by bigmikejones 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Oh yes! and then we can poll the prison population and see who they like for president! They can't vote any more, but who cares! They can still lend support to the candidate of their choice!!!
Muhahahaahahah!
Neither healthy for our country or wise for anyones campaign manager to speak so harshly. Sounds like hes been getting his information from Micheal Moore.
But perhaps the FBI should speak to him since he knows so much about it.
Not too responsible is he. I hope he's not in the running for a cabinet post if the unthinkable should come to pass.
2007-07-20 13:20:48 · answer #3 · answered by FOA 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is why I have a problem with Obama he has people like this he listens to and will put in positions of power if he wins. Its just like the question you had on his Church before which supports a segregation of the races.
2007-07-21 15:06:48 · answer #4 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
would you expect anything less from a liberal muslim wannbe? Liberals constantly try and "divert the discussion" when asked about terrorism from the muslims. Blame Bush, is usually step #2, and an outright lie about the anthax scare being a conservative lets us all know the depths to which these liberals will sink, to gain the white house.
2007-07-20 10:52:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 1⤋
He obviously never read "The Third Terrorist", by Janya Davis
There is an abundance of evidence that Abu Sayef was directly involved with OKC. The Feds covered it up because it didn't lend itself to Clintons Hegelian Dialectic at the time...
2007-07-20 10:49:48 · answer #6 · answered by Cookies Anyone? 5 · 10⤊ 1⤋
I think it is unhealthy just as unhealthy to equate liberalism as appeasers to radical Muslims.
All it does takes the focus off the problem and we start infighting.
2007-07-20 11:09:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I say, let him keep his advisor. He's only going to hurt himself by allowing such nonsense to be spewed.
2007-07-20 12:52:24 · answer #8 · answered by Roland'sMommy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It sounds like a bunch of liberal nonsense to me.
If he did know who was behind the anthrax scare then he is with holding information. Throw that man in jail.
2007-07-20 10:47:45 · answer #9 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 9⤊ 2⤋
Mr. Giangreco is pathetic and sad.
2007-07-20 10:56:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋