2007-07-20 03:34:45 · 32 answers · asked by Dirk von Pelvis 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha...
2007-07-20 03:37:14 · answer #1 · answered by jxt299 7 · 7⤊ 4⤋
YES, TOP PRESIDENT, BUT AMONG LOSERS. Have your ever heard about "The Brancaleone Crusade"? Or also true, Stan and Oliver ? The only philosophical difference is: Bush plays with lifes.
2007-07-20 03:51:25 · answer #2 · answered by charlie 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
We won't know that for a long time.
The present is no way to judge a president.
It is with time and reflection will we know what history will have to say about Bush.
Passion right now is too high for any sound judgement on Bush or Clinton.
Those who do that is just wishful thinking.
2007-07-20 03:42:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
For the New World Order, yes. He has succeeded in allowing the Illuminati to execute 9/11, he passed the Patroit Act and started a war.
So for the 13 ruling bloodlines he has done an excellent job.
The Astor Bloodline
The Bundy Bloodline
The Collins Bloodline
The DuPont Bloodline
The Freeman Bloodline
The Kennedy Bloodlin
The Li Bloodline
The Onassis Bloodline
The Reynolds bloodline
The Rockefeller Bloodline
The Rothschild Bloodline
The Russell Bloodline
The Van Duyn Bloodline
"The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes." -Benjamin Disraeli
"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes" - Justice Felix Frankfurter
"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." - James Paul Warburg
2007-07-20 03:42:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
yeah, he's at the top of the list of :
-getting his rich criminal friends off scott free
-getting his daughters a slap on the hand when they got a DWI
-telling lie after lie to start a war that has killed many u.s. soldiers and many innocent bystanders
-fixing elections
-outing CIA members out of spite
-making it unsafe for u.s. citizens to travel outside of the united states
-reading at a fifth grade level
this list could go on and on.
2007-07-20 04:18:09 · answer #5 · answered by Ms. Kitty knows it all 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I used to love Bush and voted for him twice. However, now I can't wait for him to go!
2007-07-20 04:27:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Right next to Ulysses S. Grant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulysses_S._Grant
see Scandals
"At the conclusion of his second term, Grant wrote to Congress that "Failures have been errors of judgment, not of intent.""
2007-07-20 03:43:32 · answer #7 · answered by gary L 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
he is the top
the first president in US history to enter office with a criminal record.
set the all-time record for most days on vacation by any president in US history.
TOP MONEY WASTER
set the all-time record for biggest annual budget spending increases, more than any other president in US history.
spent the U.S. surplus and bankrupted the Treasury.
shattered the record for biggest annual deficit in history.
set an economic record for most private bankruptcies filed in any 12-month period.
TOP SECRET GOVERNMENT
All records of HIS tenure as governor of Texas have been spirited away to HIS father¹s library, sealed in secrecy and unavailable for public view.
* All records of any SEC investigations into HIS insider trading or bankrupt companies are sealed in secrecy and unavailable for public view.
* All minutes of meetings of any public corporation for which HE served on the board are sealed in secrecy and unavailable for public view.
* Any records or minutes from meetings He (or his VP) attended regarding public energy policy are sealed in secrecy and unavailable for public review.
2007-07-20 03:45:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
If he started standing up to the left a little more as well as addressing the people more often. History will be kind to him- people will realize the partisan environment he was forced to fight a war in and how the opposition was more interested in their own political victories than in a victory for the nation.
2007-07-20 03:42:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
I'll give you this much:
He's in the top 43.
2007-07-20 04:57:42 · answer #10 · answered by Eukodol 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Any president serving during an unpopular war will hardly be considered best of all time.
Aside from that, can you offer any reason why he should be considered best of all time (this should be good...)?
2007-07-20 03:38:45 · answer #11 · answered by Pfo 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋