That is what we need to start calling our current president, President VETO... He most certainly can and will.
2007-07-20 03:23:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by slykitty62 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes. According to The Constitution the President is the Commander-in-Chief. The only option open to Congress is to withhold funding for the war in Iraq. They cannot order The President to pullout the troops (it's all a show).
2007-07-20 03:33:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes and no.
If Congress orders him to pull out the troops, using their Article I Section 8 powers to regulate the military, he can veto that bill. Congress can then attempt to override with 2/3 vote.
If Congress refuses to fund the occupation any more, using their Article I Section 8 powers to control federal funding, then no he cannot. The executive cannot compel legislation. He can only approve or veto legislation that Congress passes.
So, Congress can force a troop pull-out at any point, by simply turning off the money train.
The fact that they don't shows that they are ineffective.
2007-07-20 03:30:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
A President may veto anything that come to him in the form of a bill that will become law. If Congress passes such legislation a veto will likely not be sufficient because by then the Republicans will defect in sufficient numbers to override it. If Congress just passes a resolution calling for withdrawal then it is just a tool (in this case) to make Bush look even worse (if that is possible) when he ignores it.
2007-07-20 03:25:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Nightstalker1967 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes. He just needs 2/3 of Congress to defeat his veto.
2007-07-20 03:25:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
below our shape, the two properties of Congress, the living house and the Senate would desire to bypass a bill and deliver it to the President to be signed into regulation. would desire to the President veto it, it might return to the living house and Senate for a sparkling vote. If vetoed, a bill van replace into regulation, yet on condition that 2-thirds of all contributors of the two properties of Congess vote in want of overriding the President's veto.
2016-10-22 03:55:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by ramswaroop 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, Congress needs a 2/3rds vote to override his veto.
2007-07-20 03:23:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by diogenese_97 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, but he can be overridden by a 2/3 majority in Congress
2007-07-20 04:01:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by joshcating 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That was created by our creator back in the past for the good of mankind.
There were only five of them with a purpose out there.
They were "The Rose"
So don't mess around with them.
Don't know?
Go and find the missing key.
2007-07-20 05:04:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes he can..and will
2007-07-20 03:22:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by John 6
·
2⤊
0⤋