Would your convictions prevent you from allowing such an implant,or would you choose to have it done. What about yourself? You could have an "OnStar" button just like a car.
2007-07-20 03:13:40 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
i would definately consider it, i mean just think 1) how many lives it could save and 2)how many could have already been saved
2007-07-20 03:56:28 · answer #1 · answered by A K 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd consider it... but only if it can be removed when they are older with no complications or scarring. Young adults do not deserve to have their privacy invaded, but it might actually be a good idea for a small child. Why not?
For myself? I'll pass. :-)
2007-07-20 10:17:32 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope as Hottie and rel3ir said that's the start of the Anti-Christ
2007-07-20 10:27:25 · answer #3 · answered by Ohioguy95 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No that is the mark of the beast. Next they will implant in adults with Credit card info, medical and stuff...Then in time u will HAVE to have it. It's all in the Bible.
2007-07-20 10:16:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, but I think I should micro chip my husband. He tends to get lost easy...Maybe I'll just make him wear a collar...
2007-07-20 18:04:00 · answer #5 · answered by kermit 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tough call. Invasion of privacy but would be good for missing children or any missing people.
2007-07-20 10:17:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Putting a tracking device into them might not be a bad idea. It'd stop money makers 'losing' their children.
2007-07-20 10:16:25 · answer #7 · answered by UniBeauty 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I might be willing to have Lo Jack installed in mine.
I think that it would work for me just fine.
Fezik
2007-07-20 10:21:51 · answer #8 · answered by Lorie N 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I'm a little old fashioned in this regard. I prefer dog collars and leashes ! lol
2007-07-20 10:20:58 · answer #9 · answered by bushy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I would consider it
2007-07-20 10:16:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋