The only reason I won't vote for her is becasue she voted for the Iraq War. Very poor judgement on her part.
2007-07-20 02:14:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Incognito 5
·
2⤊
6⤋
1. She is a mediocre politician with mediocre experience.
2. She is an admitted globalist supporter and attended several Bildeberg Group meetings. Globalists are hell bent on creating what is technically a one world government system.
3. She wants to take away our Constitutional right to bear arms, and she is socialist in ideology.
Unfortunately, she might win because of the great number of brain dead and dumbed down Americans who vote for whoever has the biggest name, rather than looking at the issues.
And she is NOT going to bring our troops home. If you have not noticed, she changes her mind about whether she supported the Iraq War in the beginning ALL the time. She factually did support the Iraq War in the beginning, but changed her mind and denounced it just so she could win the Presidency. She, in fact, still supports the war, most likely.
2007-07-20 02:32:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
1 She is a socialist (which is reason enough)
2 While she is a power hungry political whore whose blind ambition is MORE POWER, she HATES everything America is.
3 She is a panderer and will say anything to get elected (okay most politicians do this) but she cites her 'qualifications' and 'experience' as reason to vote for her? What qualifications and experience does she have other than being first lady (a white house resident)? If that were the case then my surgeon's wife should be able to perform my surgery right? After all, she does do the billing and works in the same office as does her husband. Make sense?
2007-07-20 02:22:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cherie 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
1) She is an inept senator (I know first hand, I live in NY)
2) She is grossly unqualified
3) She supports giving 12+ million illegal aliens amnesty, at the expense of the American people.
Ron Paul is the answer, and I hope he wakes up and runs on the Libertarian or Independent ticket. It would be a great thing to see a new party in control for a change.
2007-07-20 02:45:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by tiny Valkyrie 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Frankly, Hillary does not represent me ideologically in any way. But "Supercell" you need to know that this morning on the radio, Obama said that if elected president, he plans to institute sex education starting in Kindergarden AND provide abortions through more government programs, which I don't understand since 1: the government already subsidizes the wholesale killing of our pre-born children through Medicaid (a government program) and 2: this would further force people like yourself who oppose this practice to pay more in tax dollars to support abortions. Better think about that before voting!!
2007-07-20 02:23:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I have so many it is hard to decide.
I can't help but wonder though. When Bill was president, we all know that Hillary actually ran the show.
So if Hillary gets the White House, will we get to actually see what the country would be like run under Bill?
Either way, it would be a flip flopping presidency much like it was with Bill, since they both do whatever the polls tell them to do.
2007-07-20 02:17:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by scottdman2003 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
1. I believe she wants to have socialized medicine. I don't agree with that point of view.
2. I think she is weak on national security. I believe she will do too much kow towing to other nations.
3. She seems to change her views based on the latest poll results. Although to be honest, this applies to just about every single politician out there.
4. She is somehow a Senator from New York. Basic rules apply, never vote for a politician from Massachusetts or New York. (Sorry Rudy).
5. I personally think the circumstances surrounding her scandals and several suicides of key people makes me question her integrity.
2007-07-20 02:16:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by matt b 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
1. there is no way i am ready to accept another clinton. he didnt do such a wonderful job. he just didnt have many big choses to make so it was easy to be be an ok presdient.
2. She cant hold her marriage together very well so why do we think she can run a country
3. well i just dont like her at all.
ok so no big issues because i dont care what she stands for i will not vote for her. I have no decided who i will vote for but i know it will not be her or the Muslium Guy binladen or whatever his name is.
2007-07-20 02:45:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by csweetone 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
1) Her top campaign manager is head of a union-busting PR firm. Which makes me wonder sometimes why unions continue to fund Democratic campaigns so heavily (perhaps because they believe it's their only option).
2) Perhaps wrongly, perhaps not, but I view the Bill Clinton presidency as perhaps an indicator for what Hillary's presidency would be like. Bill's presidency was certainly VASTLY better than the Bush presidency, but I can't help but think, "Can't we do a little better than repeating the brighter points of history?"
3) I honestly don't know much more than that about her.
2007-07-20 02:13:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by 1848 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
The same reason I will NOT vote for Obama
1. She wants to raise taxes
2. She is pro choice. I am pro life
3. She would appoint Justices to the Supreme Court with philosophies different from what I would like to see in the Court.
2007-07-20 02:15:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Supercell 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
Her opinion that killing the unborn is a permanent right, rather than seeking a nonlethal way to allow women to terminate unwanted pregnancy without killing the unborn.
Her support for capital punishment.
Well, that's only 2, but it is 2 big ones and more than enough.
I might go along with Ron Paul or vote for Joe Schriner.
http://www.yaktivist.com -- A place to discuss developing nonlethal weapons and nonlethal pregnancy termination technology.
2007-07-20 02:18:36
·
answer #11
·
answered by Yaktivistdotcom 5
·
0⤊
1⤋