2007-07-20 01:53:48 · 8 answers · asked by A True Gentleman 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Why should we, the case has been whitewashed. Typical story, one law for us and another for the rich and titled. The whole question should be why does the taxpayer have to foot the bill for an investigation that the man on the street knew would go nowhere. All politicians are corrupt and liars.
2007-07-20 01:58:27 · answer #1 · answered by tucksie 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not the country. Perhaps John Yates should.
I have heard the fact no charges will be brought described as "a failure". Surely this not a failure if the enquiry was unbiased. It can only be a result.
As mush as i do no trust the players in this tale i can only assumed that the use of the word failure implies a bias.
I personally think that now Brown is in charge there is little point in persuing it as a it was designed to depose Blair in the first place.
2007-07-20 02:02:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why?
We don't if he is guilty or not.
We only know that there is not enough evidence to proceed leaving everyone to form their own opinion.
The only way to clear the suspicion would be in court.
2007-07-20 02:02:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like hell we do! That man is as slippery as an eel. He got away with it as has the Blairina and the rest of them.
2007-07-20 02:16:53 · answer #4 · answered by Scouse 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The real question: does he deserve one?
The real answer: no.
2007-07-20 03:07:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you believe that there was no case to answer...i feel sorry for you.
WHITEWASH.
2007-07-20 06:28:36 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most defiantly not.
2007-07-21 00:22:44 · answer #7 · answered by harryhotun 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
who??
2007-07-20 02:01:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋