Not on our present understanding of weak and strong forces. However, give it a go - you could make a name for yourself.
2007-07-20 00:57:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A low-energy collision between these two particles results in annihilation of the particles and release of electromagnetic energy (photons). The only way this relates to gravity is that there is infinitesimally less matter after the collision than before.
PS: The electric force operates on the same distance scale as gravity. Both are inverse square with distance.
2007-07-20 18:25:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Frank N 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
All that shall come from mass annihilation is electromagnetic energy (gamma). The force of gravity is a specific form of energy. In order to answer your question a person needs to know why a field of gravity forms. First of all, Stephen Hawking in "A Brief History of Time," page 92, paragraph 3, states; "Like light, gravitational waves carry energy away from the objects that emit them." So, a field of gravity is a particular form of energy. This form of energy is described in the physics trilogy, which is: E = mc2, m = E/c2, and c2 = E/m. The last is that of a field of gravity or that of a field of time. It is an energy/mass relationship.
The form of energy spoken of in the equation is that of the heat energy contained within a mass. The greater the heat energy, the greater the field of gravity. Were a mass the size of our planet to have no heat energy within it, then it would have no field of gravity about it. Were the heat energy to increase, the force would increase.
Our sun expends 665 lbs/sec in order to keep the planets in place about it, and our planet expends 0.00444 kg/sec in order to keep us in place about it. There is an experiment that was performed a few weeks ago that proves a field of gravity is able to be formed and collapsed. It is found at http://youtube.com and the name of the experiment is "successful gravity experiment". It had to be posted in segments because of time restrictions, so it needs to be put back together. What may be of greater interest, at the same site, is "gravity engine". It begins with mass and its movement and ends with a concept for the use of gravity as a space propellent.
2007-07-20 05:53:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by d_of_haven 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
No the weak and electromagnetic force are different from gravtational force.
Remember the graviton is the theoretical force carrier particle for gravity not bosons or photons.
Fundamental interactions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction
Information on the weak interactions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction
Information on the graviton:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton
Also the weak and electromagnetic forces work on much smaller scales than gravity
2007-07-20 01:51:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by fluxraider 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only if you route power through the main deflector array and couple the heisenburg compensators to the positron beam. And THEN only if you get to engineering via a jeffries tube in time to shut down the auto destruct sequence.
whew!
2007-07-20 01:02:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by chocolahoma 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
i've always wondered about anti-gravity stuff....but sorry...even though i didn't understand alot about this(actually nothing) i don't think that anti-gravity can succeed in earth ground...and do me a a favor and never let those stupid answerers to give you their stupid comments on the question,, i never understood some americans...(i'm from jordan) every time they hear anything about science they just runaway and say "geek" "nerd" and so....that's so retarded!
and don't people know that their ipods were made by science! hah! say the truth baby....
2007-07-20 01:08:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
not really the gravitational attraction from an individual particle is negligible
2007-07-24 08:54:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by brokenwindow100 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think they (the clever people) are still searching for the graviton... i personnally believe that life is pschosomatic but then again
2007-07-25 11:21:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by mark b 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I use a simple anti-gravity device. i call it a chair.
2007-07-20 01:10:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
DoctorJohn - Lol!
err....no
2007-07-25 10:11:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋