English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This will be an extensive study. One area I'd like some input is this:

Environmentalism, as a religion, has its patron saints. Here are some:

Rachel Carlson
Paul Ehrlich
Al Gore
Sting
Meryl Streep

to name but a few. I've compiled a more extensive list, but in case of any I missed, who could you add to this list? Thanks

Love Jack

2007-07-19 18:37:49 · 2 answers · asked by Jack 5 in Politics & Government Politics

Mikeinportc - Yes, I have Thoreau, the blowhard. Actually, the Aboriginals, Native Americans, Druids, etc, go under a separate heading in environmental religion: "Angels." (Along with dolphins, whales, and the northern spotted owl.)

2007-07-19 18:54:10 · update #1

Avail - but environmentalism clearly resembles a religion - it has its dogmas, commandments, saints, demons, angels, heretics, holy relics, holy sites, holy writings, etc

2007-07-19 19:25:57 · update #2

2 answers

big difference between environmentalism and religion.
You can see the destruction pollution does to the environment. It can be seen, and proven scientifically. That pretty much excludes it from being a religion.
but i guess you would have to study a religion to understand that fact.

2007-07-19 19:11:13 · answer #1 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 0 0

The Druids ?
Thought that's where you were heading Rush, ...er ...Jack. So.... Australian Aboriginals?

Along the lines of your examples, you have to go back a lot further . : John Muir , Henry David Thoreau, Aldo Leopold ( "Sand County Almanac " is a classic , esp essay "Thinking Like a Mountain" ) My favorite line of his ( not sure where from) " The art of successful tinkering, is to save all the parts . " ;D If you only have time for one , go with Leopold . Probably more important, in actual effect , than all the rest put together.

ps Ignore any spotted owl bs . The real deal : as of '92 , when it got more notice, because of Bush campandering (Le plus sa change,....... ;D)

1) Japan didn't allow importation of finished lumber, just raw logs . So,.... we gave out >$100M in export subsidies, to make it feasible for the lumber compans to ship the logs, & the mill jobs that go with them , to Japan . Spotted owls had nothing to do with it . Suspect the situation is ~ same now, only the $ will be different .
2) The endangered species act only applies to federal land & federal money . On private land you can cut away . ( You mostly can't, because 95+% of the old-growth is gone )
3) Congress has written the laws such that any timber sale on federal land , is a net loss , $-wise .++++ The lumber is sold dirt cheap . The same thing, on private land , if you can find it, will cost a LOT more , plus the costs of road-buillding & cleanup. On federal land , WE pay those costs. So any whining about spotted owls , is just cover for somebody who was denied an opportunity to feed at the public trough. Or they have fed , but want more (i.e "All")

2007-07-20 01:47:33 · answer #2 · answered by mikeinportc 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers