We have lost more freedom and civil liberty from Bush and Cheney and that is a fact. I have no fear of Osama Bin Laden the odds of my life being negatively affected by Bush and Chaney are much greater than any run in I will ever have with any foreign threat. We are watching ideologist destroy our democratic freedoms every day while they point at a boogie man that we are supposed to fear...
2007-07-19 17:02:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
5⤋
Well from where I stand BUSH and Cheney are more of a threat to World Peace. Osama Bin Laden is just a matter to be delt with, while Bush and Cheney are major complications. It's true Bin Laden caused deaths but have you seen the death poll since Bush and Cheney have been enstated. They are the reason that the world has become chaotic not Bin Laden.
2007-07-19 17:06:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mama D 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
Even when he's the President of the United States of America he's a murderer... same history with Cheney... both one of the biggest threat to World Peace. But I don't support terrorists, Osama is an extremist that should be paying for his crimes to humanity... the difference betwen Bush - Cheney and Osama is that Bush is a murderer that dresses with style.
2007-07-19 17:07:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by David R 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
The real threat our liberals who insist upon milking this war and every casualty for no more than their own political advancement. The real danger is another Clinton being in office so we can have 8 more years of an administration pretending that Osama Bin Laden does not exist and that these terrorist want nothing more than to be our friends.
2007-07-19 17:50:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by M.B. 1
·
0⤊
4⤋
All the three and more. Osama is a product of USA who paid money, material and training for overthrowing Russians from Afghanistan. Bush did it in Iraq. many people do this throughout the world. Indra Gandhi did it in Punjab to Bindran wala and got killed by the same sect.
2007-07-19 17:03:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by rajan l 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
Heres a question. Whats the difference? Apparently from what we are fed, they are both war mongering fools who want one or the other destroyed. They both have a firm grasps on the radicals. (Yes, Americans. Who ever of you are still bowing down to Bush I'm calling a radical.)
I dunno. They all seem to basically have the same goal, just different parties. What can I say? I believe in the whole conspiracy things.
And the longer I pay attention to politics, the more I realize just how broken the government really is. And this coming from the mouth of the youth. Pretty sad, huh?
I guess its more up to what ever you really think, not us Yahoo! Dwellers.
2007-07-19 17:03:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by kalistburg 2
·
5⤊
2⤋
Mankind in general is the threat, and we are all so locked in "rightness" and in "fear" that neither side will be the first to extend the olive branch; tragic.
There is so much goodness my friend, so many precious things held in tomorrow and yet we blunder through each day without ever thinking of the new dawn.
2007-07-19 17:04:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by OPTIMIST 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
Um Osama. Im sure Bush and Cheney...DONT want to bomb their homeland. Although Bush is somewhat of an idiot and Cheneys first name is Dick...But hey...we all have problems. But out of the three...Osamas problems are the worst.
2007-07-19 17:03:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
Right now, the Bush administration is responsible for more deaths than Osama Bin Laden. Besides the fact that there is no peace in Iraq despite all of these deaths. So...I am going to have to go with.....Bush and Cheney!
2007-07-19 16:59:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by HachiMachi 5
·
7⤊
8⤋
World Peace is a utopian ideal that just doesn't fit into the world in which we live. The problem with western society is we arrogantly assume everyone else in the world lives in a similar society. Travel the world (and not just the tourist traps) and you'll see that it mostly sucks.
2007-07-19 17:01:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chad 5
·
7⤊
3⤋