English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who is better?

2007-07-19 14:45:59 · 13 answers · asked by Daniel H 2 in Entertainment & Music Music Rock and Pop

13 answers

Ah, that is a debate that is popular with me and some of my friends. I tend to like the Cannibal Corpse stuff (pre 95, before Chris left) the best. Between Six Feet Under and the Cannibal Corpse albums after 95, Six Feet Under all the way. I just prefer Chris Barnes' vocals.

2007-07-19 17:23:40 · answer #1 · answered by ♫ՖքØØķ¥♫ 7 · 0 0

Six feet under

2007-07-19 14:49:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Cannibal Corpse.

But only the first four albums.

Six Feet Under is good too, but those early CC albums are great.

2007-07-19 16:44:26 · answer #3 · answered by Elend 2 · 1 0

Cannibal Corpse is superior...

2007-07-19 15:22:06 · answer #4 · answered by dethvegetable 4 · 0 0

6 feet under

2007-07-19 14:48:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Cannibal corpse of course....dont be silly !

2007-07-20 08:05:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

six feet under.. chris barnes was alright in cannibal corpse but sfu fits him better.. sfu420!!!!!!!!!

2007-07-19 15:40:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Six feet Under ;-)

2007-07-19 14:48:31 · answer #8 · answered by Bluelady... 7 · 0 0

Of course....Six feet under....

2007-07-20 09:13:39 · answer #9 · answered by Dark Majesty 2 · 0 0

what is cannibal corpse??

2007-07-19 14:48:42 · answer #10 · answered by 4 strings 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers