what ways is capital punishment unconstitutional other then the 8th amendment?

Question

but you are for getting about mentally. what if you were on death roll every day wondering when you were going to die, today, tomorrow, next week, next month, when!!!!

Answer 1

it's also immoral, not just unconstitutional


.

Answer 2

The 8th Amendment is the only one that comes in directly.

The 5th (and 14th) apply Due Process requirements, but those are no different than for any other criminal sentence. Same with 6th Amendment trial procedures.

And capitol punishment is not generally unconstitutional under the 8th -- only for minors, or the mentally incompetent, or for some methods of execution that count as "cruel and unusual".

Answer 3

Capital punishment is NOT unconstitutional. The 8th amendment says that there is not suppose to be "cruel and unusual punishment." Execution of serial killers is not unusual to do, and killing them as quick as possible without excessive pain is not cruel. Capital Punishment should be reserved for serial killers and mass murderes. Maybe they should start doing it for rapists and pedophiles.

Answer 4

It's not unconstitutional - even taking the 8th amendment into account.

The Supreme Court has had ample opportunity to review capital punishment, and, has not found it unconstitutional - though it /has/ found specific ways in which it was exercised to be so. (Most notably, in 1972, Furman v Georgia).

Answer 5

The anti-cap. pun. people, no matter how sincere they are, always forget about the victims and the family of the victims. It takes some common sense: You're not going to behead someone just because they double parked. However, to behead a mass murderer or serial rapist not only would be quick, but appropriate. I think Mark said it best in this answer section.

Answer 6

There are various. you do no longer could sympathize with criminals or desire them to dodge a unfavourable punishment to ask if the death penalty prevents or maybe reduces crime, to look at selections and to think of correct to the hazards of executing harmless human beings. 126 human beings on death rows have been released with data that they have been wrongfully convicted. DNA is provided in below 10% of all homicides and isn’t a assure we gained’t execute harmless human beings. The death penalty does not forestall others from committing homicide. No respected learn exhibits the death penalty to be a deterrent. To be a deterrent a punishment could make particular and speedy. The death penalty is neither. homicide expenditures are bigger in states and areas that have it than in human beings who don’t. we've a competent option. existence with out parole is now on the books in 40 8 states. It skill what it says. it is for particular and speedy and barely appealed. existence with out parole is low-fee than the death penalty. The death penalty expenses plenty greater desirable than existence in detention center, as a rule using criminal technique it is meant to dodge executions of harmless human beings. The death penalty isn't reserved for the worst crimes, yet for defendants with the worst legal experts. It does not stick to to those with funds. while is the final time a rich person became into on death row, no longer to point accomplished? The death penalty does not unavoidably help households of homicide victims. homicide sufferer kinfolk around the country argue that the drawn-out death penalty technique is painful for them and that existence with out parole is an suited option. problems with dashing up the approach. Over 50 of the harmless human beings released from death row had already served over a decade. If the approach is accelerated we are particular to execute an harmless person.

Answer 7

If you are on death ROW, you did something to be there. Sorry about your luck. I believe in the death penalty. I think there should be more of it so my taxes don't have to pay to house and feed criminals.