who is more useful to our society : technocrats, bureau crates or hypocrites ?

Answer 1

Only moral persons are supposed to be acceptable to government to help the society.

Answer 2

To have a good, receptive society, you need all of these in appropriate proportions. You cannot make a good society by only one type of these. If the society is full of technocrats, such society would be too mechanical in nature and there are no emotions, passion, feelings and the existing of life will be mechanical and it does not serve any purpose.

A society full of bureaucrats, has its own problems. The society will be encumbered with full of procedural wrangles, rule of law, hierarchical problems, lethargy, ad hocism, status quoism all typical to our bureaucrats.

I am sure a society full of hypocrites does not make it a society at all.

However, you cannot find a society devoid any one of these types. It is an Utopian idea. Some percentage of any of the three types exist in any society, and it is necessary to have a check and balance to maintain equilibrium. Therefore, I believe, for a good, receptive society, you need all of these in appropriate proportions.

Answer 3

Of Course the Technocrats and then the Bureaucrats! We all know hypocrites are injurious for the society.

Answer 4

Without any doubt the technocrats.These people generate wealth.Unfortunately the bureaucrats like grapewine try to be everywhere and create hurdles.The worst are hypocrites who create more rift between the other two.
If a country's politician is not wise there will be anarchy.It is imperative that all kinds of services are required for better development of a society.Well defined rules regulations and controls are needed to run smoothly a developing country.

Answer 5

Suppose in a constituency there is Population of two lac people.
Suppose among them there are one lac valid Voters.
During an Election, suppose 50,000 people excercise their Votes
and other 50,000 remain absent from voting.

Normally there are about 10 candidates, who get following Votes :-
First get 10,000 votes - 20 % but 5 % of Population
Second get 9,000 votes - 18 % but 4.5 % of population
Third get 7,000 votes - 14 % but 3.5 % of population etc etc

Like that First one getting 20 % Votes is a Winner, actually he
represent only 5 % of total Population in the area of that
Constituency. This mathametics attracts to Castism in India.
If the Reservation system in India turns purely on Income Criteria,
what will happen to poor politicians ?

The Supreme Court tries to oppose Reservation but policians
oppose Court, for their gaining at Elections.

Except in getting job, reservation should be deleted at
educational Admissions, and at jot Promotions.

Answer 6

Definitely the Technocrats and the Bureaucrats and NOT the Hypocrats.

Answer 7

Fred Phelps for he teaches a pretend christianity George Bush who replace into against drugs yet by fluke had a bong in an oval place of work handle to the first public Shockofgod on youtube who makes use of christianity for persecuting different faiths and makes songs referred to as "Slay the Fags" i don't wanna pass too in intensity or i could freaking overflow this internet site

Answer 8

All are useful to any Society except hypocrites. You have to give respect and take respect.
Ethics in business is very important.
But hypocrites are danagerous to any Society.

Answer 9

Hypocrites are not at all useful. The other two are equally useful if they did their duties properly.

Answer 10

going by the adminstration we have running things the most obvious answer would have to be hypocrites as that seems to be the most admired these days