All three. Lust keeps things fun, love is the backbone, and money pays the bills.
2007-07-19 10:26:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by janicajayne 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
You marry for love. Love will help you through a lot of tough spots along the way. Money will buy a lot of things but it will not buy happiness and life is too short to be with some one you don't love just because they have money.
Lust will soon loose it's shine. Think of it as a candy that you just love to eat, but after a while you don't want it all the time or none at all. This too wears out quick.
2007-07-19 10:28:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by firefly06 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Love
2007-07-19 10:28:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by dixidan_2000 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lust and love should be together, if you don't have both then i don't see what the point is. If you love but have no lust then there is no excitement. Money is not the be all and end all, it doesn't always make you happy!
2007-07-19 10:32:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Chick stick 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would marry for love because lust will get you nowhere, but a quick oragasm. I don;t depend on anybody so money's not an issue. Love is the only thing that's missing and that's what a person would want. When love is present, it tends to stick around for a LONG TIME, even when you want it to disappear. So Love is my choice.
2007-07-19 10:28:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ambi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have had the chance for all. The true answer is that lust comes with true love as far as I am concerned. Money is well out of it. I can't get involved that way. For me it is all about love and respect and a decent bit of rumpy when you can get it..
2007-07-19 13:39:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by kdee 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on what stage is your life. When you are young, definitely for love, after first divorced or in the late 30's, would be for convenience. Later on when you have other things than lust, and you still available, obviously you will take this last one, right?
2007-07-19 10:28:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Aquanaut 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
love, the money and lust may not last forever but at least u have a good chance with love
2007-07-19 10:54:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't bother for any reason other than love, and even then it's not necessary...money can be had w/o marriage (and I make my own so that'd be no reason for me anyway) and one can lust after many if they're not married (or attached), without the issue of infidelity.
2007-07-19 10:27:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by . 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
its best to have all 3. I supply the money and go for love and lust
2007-07-19 10:26:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by sambgood05 1
·
0⤊
0⤋