I recently bought a product from someone on craigs list. When purchasing I agreed to there terms and conditions without reading them and was sent a cheaper and less efficent version of the product. In the terms it stated that the original ad which got me to the website was an advertisment and it did state that I would be receiving the product I got. Basically they tricked me into buying a lesser product by advertising a better product and only telling me that in the terms and conditions I agreed to but didn't read all the way through.
I'm wondering if that's legal to do and if there is anything I can do to get my money back, I know I agreed to the terms but it's pretty decieving when it's cleverly worded in terms and conditions I had to agree to in order to purchase.
Thanks in Advance :-)
2007-07-19 10:19:04 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
It sounds like the classic "bait and switch" maneuver. Refuse the product and ask for your money back.
2007-07-19 10:24:34 · answer #1 · answered by regerugged 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The words and prerequisites are truly a settlement you settle to with the intention to apply that sight. You smash the settlement, you will get banned. while you're definitely doing something unlawful relies upon on the type you smash the words and prerequisites. (do you smash yet another regulation?)
2016-12-10 17:01:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋