I think the he is. He sure as hell acts like one.
2007-07-19
10:18:32
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Dana 1981: Apologize for what!?!? I will admit he's now the new trophy holder of best bullshitter(One that was bestowed upon our previous knucklehead ,Slick Willie.) What really disturbs me now is they want Hillary1?!?! Just remember though, every couple of months get your wool sheered.
2007-07-19
10:33:54 ·
update #1
To Republican and proud: Buddy you have to admit. He does act like a democrat.
2007-07-19
10:51:22 ·
update #2
You know Daniel E. I would have to partially agree with you on that(Actually the fabian side of the coin perhaps). And no i don't have to look it up. Thanks ;)
2007-07-19
10:54:04 ·
update #3
LOL
Ron Paul is a libertarian running on the republican ticket
AND
You want to say Bush is a democrat running on a republican ticket
LOL
Not likely - fascist is probably more apt of a party name for him - maybe in a few months whenhe shows his real colors people will believe he is a fascist - by then I will label him a tyrant or dictator
LOL
For some reason - in this country - it appears that most of the people are always a few months behind on the uptake - not to worry - the truth will shake itself loose soon enough
2007-07-19 13:57:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by jimkearney746 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Sometimes he does act like a Democrat. I think his problem is that he really believes that Compassionate Conservative crap.
I saw a couple of the Liberals retorts, but that doesn't matter. We elected him because he was the best choice, BOTH times. If Democrats want to win an election once in awhile, they should run someone besides the flakes that they have been running.
W. is very similar to John McCain and I do NOT anticipate ever voting for him. It would have to come down to a choice between McCain and Hillary, before I would vote for him and I don't think John is doing anymore than wasting a lot of time and money.
2007-07-19 10:27:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by plezurgui 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Do your self a choose and practice your self on political, monetary, and social cycles. George W. Bush has carried out no longer something in any respect to get impeached. It became invoice Clinton that signed the invoice in 1999 rolling back Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. whilst he did that, it allowed banks run amuck with particular investments inclusive of mortgaged back securities, derivatives trades of each and every type, no longer in straightforward terms interior the US yet international. so a procedures as "food ailment outbreaks" that been happening because of the fact the initiating of time. With worldwide commerce being what that's these days, we are able to assume even larger issues interior the destiny. And collectively as you probably did no longer point out this, we are able to possibly assume outbreaks back of polio, small pox,TB, etc. because of the fact we've one among those good kind of immigrants that don't communicate the english language and are not getting perfect immunizations for his or her babies. gasoline expenditures....in the process the Jimmy Carter administration we had to look after meant shortages of gas...waiting in lines for hours on alternating days to even have the skill to get gas. The housing expenses of interest have been very severe, interior the babies . He even have been given on television and asked each and every person to curtail Christmas lighting fixtures furnishings for that 12 months. He additionally had the Iran hostage disaster. "hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have been given killed through this guy." it somewhat is unlucky although, think of of what number muslims could have been killed had Truman been president....Ask the folk of Japan. each and every president has had their proportion of important issues. some lots worse than others. back this comes with the cycles that I reported in the previous. so a procedures as President Bush being impeached, no longer in straightforward terms NO yet HELL NO!! I awaken each and every morning and thank God that he became our president after 9/11. i'm helpful that Gore could no longer are turning out to be to be the US back on that's ft after 9/11. If experience like blaming somebody ......oh by no skill recommendations, i'm tremendously particular all of this falls on deaf ears and a narrow recommendations.
2016-12-10 17:01:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd have to say Monarchist.
And, by birth, see's himself as a member of an international Aristocracy. They'll decide what's best for the little people - we don't need just anyone voting...only those with enough money need to be consulted.
Something along those lines anyway...perhaps more of a Dictatorship...cleanse the world....
Out I say - out, out, out
2007-07-19 11:08:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by ever_amused 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Nope he is the Saudi Royal family's puppet and eunuch. They say jump he jumps. Neither Democrat nor Republican. Truth known not even really an American.
2007-07-19 10:28:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by JUAN FRAN$$$ 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Hmmmm.... He is not a conservative Republican... Some of his policies are more liberal than many Republicans like... (immigration, entitlement programs)... but he is solid on defense and tax reform... a mixed bag, but still the best choice of what was running.
2007-07-19 13:37:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
If he had ran as a Republican 20 years ago, they would've laughed him out of the party.
2007-07-19 10:31:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Eukodol 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
You poor people, Bush and his family are in search of only power and the submission of all of us. Anything that can further the agenda of Bush and others like him is fair game. This includes amnesty, war debt, corporate consolidation, control of media, corruption, controversy. Anything but the truth! WAKE UP!
2007-07-19 10:27:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Bush is not a Democrat or Republican. He is a lying, cheating, murderous SOB, who deserves to be ridden out of Washington on a rail. IMPEACH, IMPEACH, IMPEACH.
2007-07-19 10:40:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by D squared 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
In most ways, I'd have to agree with you. And this is why the republicans lost congress. As liberal as many of his initiatives were, theirs were even more so.
I believe this because it certainly wasn't because of any ideas the democrats had. I shudder to use the words 'idea' and 'democrat' in the same sentence!
2007-07-19 10:22:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by The emperor has no clothes 7
·
3⤊
4⤋