2007-07-19 10:09:32 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Maybe they can try again to get a vote on the next slumber party.
2007-07-19 10:14:38 · update #1
I'm sure they will have another demand to retreat before September rolls around.
2007-07-19 10:13:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
definitely not. Iraq is involved in a civil war and it's not are job to settle other nation's disputes. their own elected government is taking off for the summer due to the excessive heat while our troops Dodge bullets and bombs wearing heavy military gear. Tell me what's wrong with that picture?we can no longer police the world as we did post WNW2. America is bleeding red, and George bush watches it burn like the emperor of the former great roman empire.
2007-07-19 17:20:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
maybe the schmucks who back staying in Iraq indefinitely should pack their bags and deploy over there for a year.
It's a matter of fact throughout history - there is no such thing as winning a war, no one is a winner in war.
Therefore, the person asking this question should reevaluate the term surrender and run it through some logic and critical thinking.
2007-07-19 17:17:46 · answer #3 · answered by armypoetess 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
"Surrender Bill," what right-wing talk show did you get that term from?
I think they're calling it the "Pull America's Image Out Of The Toilet Bill."
2007-07-19 17:21:34 · answer #4 · answered by Sir N. Neti 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Who would they surrender too? Iraq never attacked us. War was never declared. There isn't, nor was there ever a clear definition of victory or defeat. If we ever surrendered to the terrorists it was when G.W. convinced us we should act like we're terrorized.
2007-07-19 17:19:36 · answer #5 · answered by socrates 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What's wrong with surrender? You make it sound so bad, like we're so tough we can't surrender. We screwed up, bigtime, and the sooner we admit it, the sooner we can address the real issues here, and if surrendering is the way to get there, then I'm all for it.
2007-07-19 17:15:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
For the last time, it's not a SURRENDER! It's a Phased Redeployment to Victory!
2007-07-19 17:17:07 · answer #7 · answered by Eukodol 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sign up and go to Iraq Jeffy!! Show those lib surrender monkeys you're no coward!
2007-07-19 17:14:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
for those of you out there who don't have plastic covers on your sofa - 'surrender bill' - is a talking point straight off the rush limbaugh show today.
so, naturally we will see it quoted word for word out here over and over again.
just don't ask them why bush surrendered to bin laden...
2007-07-19 17:13:32 · answer #9 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
what are you talking about?
surrender implies ceding to an oppressor
we're the oppressors in Iraq jimbo
2007-07-19 17:12:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋