A Government official used her position to get her husband a lucrative private contract with her department,?

Question

And a person involved in exposing the nepotism and cover-up was arrested and jailed for doing so. How many think this is fair?

Answer 1

You used an oxymoron.

Government - Fair.

it does not compute

Answer 2

Probably he/she was poor. The legal system is such that if you have lots of money you can win almost any case.

Answer 3

was she voted in?.....or just answered phones in a federal building.......

Answer 4

First - the lady with public position IS PAID USING TAX PAYER'S DOLLARS ... therefore -

When she used time on the clock as a Public Servant to bring an INCREASE, BENEFIT, PROFIT and/or etc. and tax dollars cannot be used as an investment for a Public Servant and because it directly benefits HER HOUSEHOLD BY AND THROUGH HER HUSBAND ... if the information is there -

IT IS CALLED A MISAPPROPRIATIONS OF PUBLIC/FEDERAL FUNDS ... why Federal? Because the city gets federal funding and THE MONEY GETS MIXED ... cannot dicipher between city taxes and federal fundings when they pay for paper, roads, police cars and/or etc.

Second - Abuse of Office wherein under color of office this woman was using her office to better her finances and personal positions ...

Also - her having the guy arrested that pointed her out - the above also applies AND MORE - I WILL EXPLAIN SHORTLY ...

See - the City attorneys/lawyers/paralegals and/or etc. had to prosecute the guy - USING TAX PAYERS DOLLARS for his EXPOSING COMMISSIONED FELONIES ... which would then fall under "ORGANIZED CRIME" as if one RETAILIATES against anyone for exposing a commissined felony - that constitutes "ORGANIZED CRIME" which could also be used to bring forth violations of the "RICO ACT" ...

Under the RICO ACT - you yourself if you have the actual information that would prove the conspiracies between the lady in office, the city attorneys and/or etc. used to prosecute TO HIDE THE FELONIES COMMITTED AND MAYBE PROMOTE THAT WICKED AND EVIL PUBLIC SERVANT ... at the cost of those whom they are sworn by oath of office to protect - it is now a "CONSPIRACY" ... and, you with that information or the guy in jail can become A "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL" even if he is not an attorney/lawer or hold a license.

Congress gave us all that right - because if the DA will not use the resources to investigate - Congress gave you that right if you have the means to and have conducted the investigation - GRANTING YOU MORE POWER THAN THE DA WHO WILL TRY TO STOP IT ... BUT CANNOT. You can prosicute it with a Civil Action and with Treble damages to be paid when proved ...

I can go on and on with this as I have the same thing going on me - but; I fight the jerks by myself filing Sui Juris ...

The court you must understand is also owned and operated by the City it practices in and the county thereof.

Let me show you some real laws that you can use to help the guy - and how you can come back on the court for its aiding and abetting the known felons/public servants ...

18 United States Code Section 4 (18 USC 4),
the FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, RULE 3.
“Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United Sates, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”

> PART I > CHAPTER 73 > § 1513
§ 1513. Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant
(e) [2] Whoever knowingly, with the intent to retaliate, takes any action harmful to any person, including interference with the lawful employment or livelihood of any person, for providing to a law enforcement officer any truthful informatioTITLE 18n relating to the commission or possible commission of any Federal offense, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.


TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 241
§ 241. Conspiracy against rights
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.


TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 242
§ 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

I hope this helps - the courts hate this stuff ... you can see what the City did to me when I brought forth prima facie evidence of commissioned felonies - and I am still fighting them over this and starting to come out on top ... they tried to throw me in prison for 10 years and are now realizing that it may be the 10 plaintiffs against me that may be going instead ...

Please copy and paste this stuff and help that guy with it if you can ...:

FROM: http://mamma91.mamma.com/search?evid=ce0...

Sect member threatens to seize city's property

Abilene Reporter/July 26, 2003
By Loretta Fulton

Abilene City Hall is taking seriously a threat from a man to confiscate more than $1 billion in computers and other city property as repayment for a 1989 house demolition - even if the amount raised eyebrows.

"We don't have nearly that many computers," City Attorney Sharon Hicks said.

On Wednesday, Hicks e-mailed city employees advising them of the warning from "Mr. Allan Douglas Fountain, now known as Al-Yahnai Fountain Hawkins."

Hicks cautioned employees to alert an official if anyone called or arrived in person requesting city property. So far Fountain has not attempted to take any property, Hicks said. The city issued a cease-and-desist order against him.

"Right now we are just proceeding with the alert until he takes more steps," Hicks said.

The dispute stems from the 1989 demolition of Fountain's house at 600 Virgil St., located off T&P Lane, where the House of Yahweh headquarters is located. The religious sect, labeled a cult by some, was started by former Abilene police officer Bill Hawkins, now known as Yisrayl Hawkins. Many of Hawkins' followers changed their last name to match his.

A House of Yahweh spokeswoman said she did not know Allan Douglas Fountain or Al-Yahnai Fountain Hawkins but would ask him to return a reporter's phone call if he was located.

The phone call was not returned. Neither name is listed in the Abilene phone book.

Hicks said that in 1989, before she became city attorney, Fountain filed suit against the city. His house had been condemned in January of that year and demolished. Fountain was ordered by the city to remove the rubble.

Hicks said the house had burned, and the city cleared the lot when Fountain failed to.

Fountain's suit was filed in state district court, but was transferred to federal court, Hicks said, because one part of it alleged the city did not follow due process, a constitutional issue.

The suit alleged the due process issue arose when the city failed to "properly declare the house a nuisance," Hicks said. In 1991, U.S. District Judge Sam Cummings issued a summary judgment in the city's favor, dismissing the suit.

The suit also alleged an "action for slander of title" because the city filed a lien on the property to pay for its removal. It also claimed the city trespassed on Fountain's property. The entire suit was dismissed in Cummings' order, Hicks said.

Recently, Fountain began sending letters to the city requesting information on employees from 1989 such as bank account numbers, Hicks said, but the city did not respond.

Hicks said the city is not taking extra precautions other than alerting employees. Most of the city's vehicles are police cars, Hicks said, which would be difficult to steal. Heavy equipment operators were sent a memo advising them of Fountain's threat to take city property.

"We continue to take the same safeguards we normally do," Hicks said


Hope this helped.

Peace;

Aintmyfault
.