1) Saying Dems are Communists?
2) Saying Dems hate freedom?
3) Making fun of John Edwards’ hair?
4) Referring to Obama’ middle name?
5) Referring to Obama as ‘Osama’ or as a Muslim?
6) Asking you why you don’t support the troops?
7) Bashing a Clinton? Any Clinton?
8) Bashing a Kennedy? Even dead ones?
9) Pointing to the stock market as economic evidence?
10) Or do you have a different favorite you'd like to add?
2007-07-19
09:34:50
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Incognito
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Oh I forgot-
11) Saying Dems are lazy and don’t have jobs?
12) Asking Dems why they want to steal their stuff?
13) Calling Dems ‘Race Pimps’?
2007-07-19
09:36:26 ·
update #1
Nice AL CRACKA, I forgot that one.
2007-07-19
09:41:16 ·
update #2
You're right tangerine.
2007-07-19
09:44:39 ·
update #3
GABY are you SERIOUSLY suggesting the Republicans liked Bobby and John Kennedy? Or did you realize in the 80's that they were GREAT and that America loved them, so you should too?
2007-07-19
09:53:02 ·
update #4
My favorite one has to be "We're fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them over here".
2007-07-19 09:38:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
very own assaults needless to say show a serious loss of know-how of the information, so in mild of that, and for those easily fascinated approximately in all hazard looking a answer to worldwide warming and climate exchange, attacking the messenger is obviously not a valid tactic. regardless of the undeniable fact that, from their viewpoint, there is, regrettably, a mentality that countless people these days in simple terms prefer to be combative and rebellious even no count if it is not of their acceptable pastimes. With that for the duration of techniques, we would desire to then comprehend that it is an entire waste of time to attempt and convince the so-observed as "deniers" that they are certainly, in simple terms undeniable incorrect. To them, attacking is unquestionably and regrettably, a valid tactic... in case you have been to profile the relatively some deniers, i'm particular you may discover that some in simple terms prefer to reason difficulty and spot what they might get away with, some, as pronounced in different questions, have ulterior motives and different agendas - an occasion being that they have bought out to industries that have not any pastime in "saving the planet" or "growing to be a tree hugger" and finally, you have people who innocently, yet wrongly have faith that there relatively isn't any climate exchange or worldwide warming. in spite of you prefer to call it, they don't and wouldn't have faith in it... So, hence, in some unspecified time sooner or later, we would desire to circulate on, and leave people who're unconvinced to their incorrect information. curiously that there is adequate help for precise scientific learn and the golf green circulate so as that we don't would desire to convince people who unbelievably rail against what we've discovered to be actual...
2016-12-14 13:53:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by jowers 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like most of most yours except #8. Most Conservatives liked and respected Bobby and John. They were real Democrats with guts. They are probably rolling over in their graves watching the Dem's of today. I don't know what #4 is?
2007-07-19 09:47:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by GABY 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I pick #1. Actually, I think it's funny how so many of them call us both Communists and fascists in the same breath, because it shows that they don't know much about history. If they did, they would know that Communism and fascism are completely different and that the Communists and fascists were diametrically opposed.
2007-07-19 09:39:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by tangerine 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
They are all pretty boring and pretty pathetic. You forgot that all liberals are on welfare. That one is probably my favorite because it just proves the depth of their idiocy. The other one is that liberals follow Hitler. Or, that liberals are just like Hitler. Or that Hitler was a liberal. LOL, Once again it proves their ignorance of history and the facts.
2007-07-19 09:42:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I like the one where they haul cots into the capitol building and have photo ops by them and tehn go back to their 5 star hotel rooms to sleep...oops that was a dem tactic...hmmm BTW did u see the fed judge dismissed valerie planes case today without comment...enough of that distraction. tangerine, I think you need to look at teh history books, if you don't think stalin (who was a totalitarian dictator in a communist state) was a fascist you have a lot to learn....
2007-07-19 09:40:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Steelhead 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
5)Referring to Obama as ‘Osama’
If it's good enough for Senator Kennedy it's good enough for the Republicans...
(Oops, that was (8), sorry, guess that's really my fave).
2007-07-19 09:39:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Those are all good ones.You basicly got them all covered.
except calling us dumb, terrorists, poor, Christian haters, baby killers.
2007-07-19 09:47:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Joshrules 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Paranoid Dem heh?!
=
2007-07-19 09:40:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
Watching Dems give happy hugs to child molesters for sure=)
awww 5 thumbs down so far did i hurt your feelings =(
2007-07-19 09:39:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by JohNy 2
·
2⤊
6⤋