English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-972875032828177268&q=total+proof&total=176&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

Count how many times the word "explosive" and "explosives" is used

2007-07-19 07:54:17 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Other - News & Events

Haha after watching the video how can you still say conspiracy theory nonsense? Go stick your head back in the ground and wait for the next "terror attack."

2007-07-19 08:04:51 · update #1

Gimmie a star - NOW!

2007-07-19 08:12:19 · update #2

11 answers

There is abundant credible evidence and considerable speculative circumstance to assume that the 9-11 'terrorist' attack was, indeed, no such thing. It is also not beyond belief that the U.S. government would lie to its people, as it has done countless times before:
* The U.S. has never satisfactorily explained the events surrounding a "UFO landing" in Roswell, NM in 1947;
* The government denied reports of U.S. spy planes flying over the U.S.S.R. until Nikita Khrushchev shot one down and displayed it for the world to see;
* The truth about the Kennedy assassination remains in question, with all documents sealed for 75 years, so that - in 2038 - when those documents are opened, most of us who witnessed that event will be dead and gone;
* The government LIED about our battleships being attacked in the Gulf of Tonkin, which eventually involved us in the Vietnam War;
* The government LIED about the effects of Agent Orange on Vietnam veterans;
* The Nixon administration LIED about a third-rate burglary at the Watergate Hotel until two enterprising reporters dug out the truth and forced a U.S. President to resign in disgrace;
* The government LIED about 'weapons of mass destruction' in Iraq, and used the lie as a reason for which to attack another sovereign nation that in no way threatened, provoked or attacked the United States;
* The government LIED about the torture and sexual abuse to 'detainees' in direct violation of the rules of the Geneva Convention;
* The government didn't tell us about 'secret' CIA prisons where they could detain prisoners and deprive them of basic human rights;
* The government has conned us into believing this Iraq 'war' is about bringing democracy to Iraq, when - in fact - it's all about OIL and WAR PROFITEERING.

Why is so unfathomable to think that the government may have LIED to us about the 9-11 tragedy? -RKO- 07/19/07

2007-07-19 08:26:37 · answer #1 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 11 5

Why has there been no true investigation? How many hours can you watch a building imploding without knowing enough about how it all works to be able to make an intelligent judgment as to why and how, much less who? That this was done for the specific intent to invade Iraq l have no doubt, nor do l have any ambiguity as to who caused it to happen. Clue, it was not an old bearded man in a cave, at least not without complicity. l believe it was done by officials who have been using the Constitution as toilet paper. For personal financial benefit. Perhaps the lack of coverage is because people don't want to hear it. They sure don't want to believe it. We have not endured warfare on our soil. 3,000 people plus the destruction of 3 buildings and a part of a 4th are negligible in terms of "collateral damage," the incidental but necessary cost of achieving a military/financial objective. This action was very cheap for the benefits it produced. The American people have been willing to pay the price of this injury without demanding to know who is responsible for it. Were they not, the truth would have been out long ago and so many people would not have died and suffered as a result.

2016-05-17 12:00:00 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

RKO has it right. What about the dismissed testimony to the 9/11 Commission by former janitor of WTC 1 of 20yrs William Rodriguez. He was in sub-level 1 when he heard and felt an explosion below him. He thought it was a generator that might've exploded. Then he heard and felt an explosion way up above him. That was the plane. He then heard many explosions during the whole time between that and when the tower collapsed.

Jet fuel couldn't melt or weaken the steel used by the WTC. The tower's steel was certified to temps of 2000deg F for several hrs. Besides, if the fires only melted the steel, then we would've seen the building slowly sagging. It didn't, it just all of a sudden came straight down in near free fall speed into its own footprint reducing 200,000tons of steel and thousands of cubic feet of concrete into dust. Yeah, pancake collape my A$$!!! 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!

2007-07-19 16:47:40 · answer #3 · answered by Ted S 4 · 5 3

Plane hit tower, jet fuel ignited, massive fire cause things inside to explode. Its that simple. Have you ever burned a log and heard it pop, same thing. In a building with transformers, massive electrical circuits and all that stuff, things are going to explode when they get that hot. Just because people say they heard rumbling and describe it as the sound of an explosive doesn't mean that bombs were planted. It means that things inside the building were exploding, which is something to expect WHEN A PLANE HITS A BUILDING!

2007-07-19 14:01:10 · answer #4 · answered by jaymes_07 7 · 4 4

I once saw a news story about car crashing into a house. The owner of that house said 'I thought gas line exploded and heard loud bang. I thought it was bomb going off. I heard this big boom, bang!'

I once saw people liken sound of firecracker to gun shots, grenades....etc

Can your ear distinguish sound of firecrackers from gun shot? Sound of loud crash from explosions?

KEY WORD::::::"HEARD"

Geez, can you hear unseen stalker inside your house right now? Watching you right at this moment?

Big concrete building collapse without big noise? Since when? People don't ever make mistake identifying sounds? Since when?

Great, All we need to solve complex disaster is human ears! Marvelous idea!


http://usinfo.state.gov/media/misinformation.html

2007-07-19 16:34:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

Y'know.... just because you say something loudly, repetitively or incessantly, it doesn't make it true.

I'm not even going to expend the energy trying to reason with you, because it wouldn't make the slightest difference-- conspiracy theorists don't often listen to arguments that contradict their preconceived notions.

2007-07-19 12:56:00 · answer #6 · answered by Lanani 6 · 4 7

What's your point? Is that what you have to say about 9/11? Watch the videos more closely and tell me that is the most important aspect.

2007-07-19 08:08:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 8

echos

2007-07-19 11:01:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

There were at least two explosions, from the two planes. Whats your point?

2007-07-19 07:57:42 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 8 8

Silly conspiracy theory nonsense.

2007-07-19 08:02:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7 10

fedest.com, questions and answers