English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

She claimed she would be like Lorraine Bobbit and not like Hilary if her husband was ever caught cheating. Well, he has been caught. Is he still...ahem...'whole'? At the very least, has she left him like she promised she would do? Or did she apologize to Hilary for being wrong? I am sure she did something, afterall, she is a member of the party of accountability...

2007-07-19 06:07:03 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

macd, she said it, to make Hillary look the fool for standing behind her husband. And now she got the short end of the stick. I am just holding her to her words, and even gave the chance of her apologizing or leaving her husband, if she didn't want to cut it off, like she said she would. But you don't read the whole question. And I don't hate conservatives, I hate republicans.

2007-07-19 06:25:37 · update #1

6 answers

Maybe that's why he's hobbling around?


If not, he deserves to be. .:)

2007-07-19 06:09:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Evidently Vitter never sought advice from the Kennedy Institute of Foolin' Around. JFK, RFK and Ted could all have given him tips on how to avoid getting caught.

2007-07-19 06:13:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Ya, isn't she a case? I do feel so sorry for her and the children, but I think the s**t is really going to hit the fan when the whole truth comes out about what he was up to.

"Fasten your seat belts, it's going to be a bumpy night", as the old saying goes.

2007-07-19 06:24:25 · answer #3 · answered by Mezmarelda 6 · 0 0

I mean... really....

Obviously she was saying it to make a point. Do you think that everyone who says "I'll kill my wife / husband if he cheats on me" really means it? How does the number that actually go through with it compare to the number that say it?

I know you hate Republicans and Conservatives, but try harder to make us look bad. With Bush and the War it isn't too hard. This is just ridiculous.

2007-07-19 06:12:36 · answer #4 · answered by macDBH 2 · 0 1

No, She stands behind her husband.

Which by all accounts, is the right thing to do, in order that their marriage may continue.

2007-07-19 06:11:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Hmmm...maybe she meant it metaphorically!:) There are many ways you can castrate a man without wielding a knife!LOL!

2007-07-19 06:10:15 · answer #6 · answered by tangerine 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers