2007-07-19 02:26:56 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yeah, they gotta dig up the little dirty deed he did in the oral..I mean oval orifice...umm...office. Somehow he still managed to balance the budget while getting his pipes cleaned. He still took care of business while he was playing the harmonica..I mean Monica. Maybe the Republicans should take a page from his book. I think they just took the page, in fact very young pages.
2007-07-19 02:41:39 · answer #1 · answered by Lefty 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yeah,
Do Democrats need Republicans to justify the actions of people within their own party, too?
Its a system where they are both so bad, they can only ever win because the other choice seems worse.
2007-07-19 02:32:04 · answer #2 · answered by freedom first 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Republicans were at one time civil and decent folks
THEN Richard Millhouse Nixon was elected President.
THEN Richard Millhouse Nixon authorized a burglary
THEN Richard Millhouse Nixon tried to cover it up
THEN Richard Millhouse Nixon was caught red handed in the middle of a felony
THEN Richard Millhouse Nixon lied and tried to squirm out of it
THEN Richard Millhouse Nixon finally did the right thing and resigned the Presidency
THEN Richard Millhouse Nixon's supporters started a vendetta to go after any democrat that ever runs
THEN Richard Millhouse Nixon's supporters decided that "getting even" was much more important than admitting they were wrong, JUST LIKE THEY WERE WRONG ABOUT VIETNAM
THEN Richard Millhouse Nixon's SUPPORTERS SUDDENLY BECAME THE PARTY OF HATRED AND
BEGAN WHAT WE KNOW TODAY AS
POLITICS OF PERSONAL DESTRUCTION
Makes ya wonder huh WWJD?
2007-07-19 02:46:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think of CLinton is mixing apples and oranges! Tea events are created from forefathers' believers and our shape. President Clinton is summarising patriots are patriot regulation breakers. If this administration keeps accusing our lots of wrongdoing, it is going to stress them to take action like they did in 1776. ask your self have you ever been to a tea social gathering? Many particpants are proud provider adult men who've served their u . s . a . in time of want. many of the particpants have by no ability long previous a criminal offense. If this administration and the social gathering and czars appointed want to %. on the lots. i'm particular our trustworthy countrymen will look for stronger action.
2016-10-22 01:11:13 · answer #4 · answered by zaragosa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Some things are unjustifiable. Bill Clinton is just a great example of how both democrats and republicans have the same vices and faults, and you have to criticize both or excuse both if you are going to be honest. Only criticizing one or the other is hypocritical.
2007-07-19 02:32:06 · answer #5 · answered by Leah 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No they don't. Everyone can tell that ANYTHING that is wrong with this world is truly Bill Clinton's fault.
Just ask truly fairly and balanced journalists like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, or Bill O'Reilly.
;-)
2007-07-19 03:26:06 · answer #6 · answered by Rocco R 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
oh, i'm so disgusted with all of them.
as for bill clinton, i'm more at ease with him getting a bj than with gw bush (moron) - getting us involved in a war that we can't escape!!!!
2007-07-19 02:51:22 · answer #7 · answered by KISS MY neice33 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, we just like to point out Liberal hypocrisy when they bash Bush for things.
And Clinton is such an easy example.
2007-07-19 02:36:25 · answer #8 · answered by Philip McCrevice 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Based on many of the arguments I see here and in other discussion forums it would seem that they do.
2007-07-19 02:33:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
What actions and justifications are you talking about?
2007-07-19 02:31:24 · answer #10 · answered by nosf37 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋