English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you were held at gunpoint and could only save one of them? Why that person?

2007-07-18 17:31:59 · 20 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government Politics

Mack C (below) Met the SS a few times due to my old Civil Service position.

2007-07-18 17:37:54 · update #1

20 answers

Assuming your facts and granting the "only one" limitation for purposes of the hypothetical......

Hillary. Because of the old tradition of "women and children get saved first". No better reason than that.

2007-07-18 17:35:37 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 6 4

I would warn Bush 2 as he is president at the moment and would be in the position to come to the aid of the others. If I could tho I'd warn them all cause I don't let my feelings for a particular party get in the way of lives being in danger.

2007-07-19 00:37:35 · answer #2 · answered by Brianne 7 · 1 1

Tough call, do any have young kids? under normal circumstance a politician is worth less than almost any other life form, nominally above protozoa. So for the sake of parent-less children I might want to save one. Not that any of them would care about making parent less children, But that is what makes the proletariat better humans.

2007-07-19 01:30:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The thought of the NSA monitoring this forum, tells me its a good idea to answer Bush 2.
ask again after January 2009.

2007-07-19 00:54:12 · answer #4 · answered by jj 5 · 0 2

Bush, because he is leading us in the right direction with the least amount of government control. The Democrats want to increase the amount of control the government has on Americans.

2007-07-19 00:43:55 · answer #5 · answered by Jim B 1 · 0 3

I'd warn Billy Bob. He has more to offer society. And he's a like able person.

2007-07-19 00:42:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

cheney... because he would try to cook something up in the background secretly, screw it up, and everyone would be saved. Seriously, probably Hillary.

2007-07-19 00:38:39 · answer #7 · answered by armypoetess 3 · 0 1

Well in taking coragryphs answer on a tangent, If you warned Bill that would be counter productive to saving the women so I guess you could save Hillary, although how much of a woman she is I dunno.

2007-07-19 00:44:44 · answer #8 · answered by sociald 7 · 0 2

My family

2007-07-19 00:52:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Every life is important!!

Would any of those you mentioned do the same for an American Christian? One of us?

2007-07-19 00:50:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers