No, I try not to fill my mind with absolute garbage. I'll read things written or spoken by conservatives sometimes just so I can better grasp their point of view, but she's not even a conservative. She's just a nut. She makes Rush Limbaugh seem almost as sane and intelligent as an average Joe. Not even conservatives respect her anymore. Ann Coulter lost any notice I would take of her about 100 or more absurd and baseless false accusations ago. She's just like how I tune out the sound of lawn mowers after a few moments of hearing their loud, useless drone.
2007-07-18 18:01:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Doctor 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I never read Ann Coulter's columns. I took a shot at this one, but I just couldn't get farther in than 8 or 9 sentences before the accumulation of lies made me ill. It did remind me of what a good idea it is never to read that raving psychopath's crap, and in that sense could be considered, in some very loose definition, slightly useful.
2007-07-18 18:05:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by A M Frantz 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Okay...I dropped everything and read the column. Basically the 'liberal' strawman was accused of several crimes and George Bush was named the best thing since sliced white bread. The major flaw in her argument rests on a major flaw in her thinkiing. She believes that there are large numbers of her fellow citizens that are 'liberals' as defined by the propaganda put out by the right wing's Ministry of Truth. (The right wing talk show bozos and FOX) The 'liberal', as she has been lead to believe, is a terrible person who hates America, wants to surrender to the 'terrorists' and in his/her off duty time wants to raise your taxes, control your life, institute socialism, abort your children, force you to attend 'government schools', promotes gay sex and marriage and wants take your car away from you. Toss in 'global warming' and the 'liberal media' and you get the picture where's she's coming from. She hasn't yet seen anyone who believes all that nonsense is a good thing, but she knows they're there. Ann attacks the strawman enemy in every column..she knows her public....if you believe this woman you're a real sucker. If you repeat her nonsense you have a real problem with reality!
2007-07-18 18:23:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Noah H 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I defy everyone to make it each of ways via one in each of her "columns." She is an "author" in user-friendly terms interior the strictest experience that she places letters right into a undeniable order and throws some punctuation around right here and there. Her "writings" are as vacuous as they're meandering and barely can one determine a cohesive topic or a nugget of reality amidst all of the vitriol. while sponsored right into a nook, her "trump card" seems to be to call into question her detractor's sexual orientation. She is crammed with hate for everyone who dares to have a various opinion than her, and her comments look in user-friendly terms to be "I hate Liberals, I hate Mexicans, I hate homosexuals, I hate Muslims" and so on. you may no longer convince me for one 2d that this vile, reprehensible wind-up toy has something reliable to declare approximately "non-white" individuals interior the privateness of her own residence. Coulter represents each thing it is faulty with the present information tendencies of allowing blogster-politicos a platform from which to unfold illogic and lack of awareness. And sure, there are left-leaning equivalents on the different section. Thats no longer what it is approximately.
2016-11-09 20:51:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That media whore is at it again. Using circular logic to try to convince herself she is not full of crap. It isn't working, she is definitely full of it. What the Repubs problem is, is that they already doctored information and lied to us all once before. So we're suppose to believe them now? It just seems way to coincidental. Bush popularity at a all time low, 70% of the US wanting troops out, the Dems making head way in the House and the Senate and this new report comes out to scare us all again. If that report is true and Al Queda has regained strength then we have only this administration to blame. Their bungling of the hunt for Bin Laden, their ill advised invasion of Iraq, Bush has been the greatest recruitment tool that Al Queda could have ever hoped for.
2007-07-18 18:28:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't ever read that poisonous harpy's droning. It's bad enough catching her by accident on political shows. She's so full of hate and bile that she's just intolerable. I like hearing all sides from political parties, but she's not anything but a shock hate maven for money, not worth the time. She gives conservatives a bad name, and I know more than one that really detests her for that.
2007-07-18 18:35:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
This American read it, and as usual coulter the talking head con chickenhawk is wrong.
"For six years, the Bush administration has kept America safe from another terrorist attack"
anthrax killer(s) - still at large.
the beltway snipers -two islamic radicals - lee boyd malvo illegal alien
Why do bush supporters ignore the Americans killed in these attacks? (after 9/11)
2007-07-18 18:26:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
it's the same empty rhetoric she always spouts. i don't think i've heard her say anything new (other than calling people fag*ots) in about 5 years. i do find it quite amusing that nearly every article of hers likens the democrats to hitler and the nazis. i mean, really, haven't we gotten past that childish chat room nonsense yet? i guess she hasn't.
the lowest form of debate is personal attack. and that's all i've ever heard from ms. coulter.
2007-07-18 18:04:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Even reading Nazi propaganda seems moderate and thoughtful compared to Coulter's shrill reactionary noise.
2007-07-18 20:00:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Iain G 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I don't care to read her cr*p and lies. She has no credibility. Why doesn't she do everyone a favor and take a long one-way walk on a short pier?
2007-07-18 19:37:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by twomanybooks64 3
·
1⤊
0⤋