2007-07-18 16:37:51 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
1. Friendly fire deaths are common to every armed conflict in history. It's just sad when it happens.
2. Osama is most likely hiding in the vast tribal regions on the Afganistan-Pakistan border. The governments have no control over these areas and OBL has a strong folowing abong the radical religious sects that make up these tribes. He can hide here forever. If you recall, the Olympic Park bomber was hiding in a stretch of woods in North Carolina for years. They had people who saw him go in. He had to give up from shear bordom to get caught. OBL is in a much larger area with people who support him and chicks to "entertain" him.
3. No anthrax was found in Iraq. Bush used that story to get the war started. Was it the right thing to do is a differant question.
4. The towers fell cause they were hit by planes. It happened on live TV. There was a fire. Jet fuel heated the steel building supports which are under rediculous pressure. When they hit the softening point the building collapses under the strain.
5. Not much man. Wazzup with you?
1/4 of Americans are retards
2007-07-18 16:57:24 · answer #1 · answered by joshbl74 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
As to what caused the collapse of the Twin towers on 9 11 the towers had no center columns and the heat of the burning jet fuel weaken the steel causing the towers to collapse. As for Osama, better informed folks then me will have to figure that out. As for the gov. killing troops in Iraq, have a question as to what you are referring to. Iraqis? Americans??? or Shia militia?? Maybe you could be more specific??
2007-07-18 16:50:47 · answer #2 · answered by longroad 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
9/11/2001 2 jet liners hit the international commerce center in manhattan city. 30 minutes later yet another jet liner hits the pentagon. 30 minutes later the south Tower of the international commerce center Falls.30 minutes later the final tower falls. Its the biggest Terrorist attck on the U.S. 3,000 die. Osama claimed responsiblilty. some weeks later the Anthrax assaults are occurring. they supply up 2 weeks later. U.S. troops combat in Afghanastan. 2 years later Saddam Huissien is understood to have weapons of mass destruction. The U.S. as a rule leaves Afghanastan and flow and bomb Iraq. Then U.S. unearths out that there are no weapons of mass destruction there. U.S. attempt to get out yet Iraqi human beings combat U.S. Troops because of the fact they think of that U.S. took there land. Iraqi everyone continues to be scuffling with U.S. troops for no reason.
2016-11-09 20:46:56 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
False premise.
Next question.
2007-07-18 16:42:31 · answer #4 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Did you just beam down here from the planet Xanex, or are you really that uninformed?
2007-07-18 16:41:38 · answer #5 · answered by booman17 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because we're fighting the terrorist muslims. Probably dead, don't know. Two airplanes. Not much.
2007-07-18 16:44:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
One question at a time fool
2007-07-18 16:41:07 · answer #7 · answered by Sealsangel 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
to fight terrorism,who knows?hopefully dead,big airplanes with terrorists inside,nothing much just answering this stupid question
2007-07-18 16:47:02 · answer #8 · answered by LOST_fanatic:)! 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Did you take your medication today?
2007-07-18 16:42:35 · answer #9 · answered by sSuper critic 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Is there a question in that soup?
2007-07-18 16:40:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋