ok alot of people claim TNA is better than WWE they even claim dat the New ECW suck well people numbers do not lie so you tell me whats up now? (P.S. im a new TNA fan but still numbers dont lie)
TNA ratings-1.1 to 1.4 every week
WWE Raw ratings- 3.7 to 4.1 every week
WWE SmackDown ratings- 2.9 to 3.3
ECW rating's- 2.0 to 3.0
(so you know im not lien google the ratings WWE haters)
2007-07-18 16:28:36 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
i 4 got to add that those have been the average ratings for raw smackdown and TNA for a while TNA has always been that low for you that are saying "TNA" will pick up i meen think about it WCW beat WWE for like 80 something weeks in a row WWE beat TNA for like five years in a row and also if you need proof the reason y ECW had low ratings is cuz paul heyman was trippin but its a little higher then the orignal ECW (i kno im just as suprised as yu are)
2007-07-18 17:30:16 · update #1
you forgot to say SD has second highest ratings for CW so its never gonna die
2007-07-18 16:31:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE is still better than TNA and will be for a long time. WWE has better writing & more publicity plus 5 hrs of air time during the week TNA is still pushing a 1 hour show during the week. In my opinoin TNA has the better Active roster & in ring action with all the injuries, tradegies, firings & Quiting but nobody that doesnt watch TNA on a weekly basis would know because the spend no money on advertising.
2007-07-25 10:05:18 · answer #2 · answered by omega2221981 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA's effect has already overwhelmed ECW in the scores.notwithstanding it won't beat the scores for uncooked or SD because of the fact the coach is broadcast on Spike television which has a constrained broadcast.this suggests that TNA isn't as severely obtainable as WWE is, subsequently the better scores for uncooked and SD.effect is gettting a universal a million.a million or a million.2 score which for Spike is extremely stable ( and the best rationalization for Spike getting effect on a three-twelve months deal in the 1st place, so TNA isn't shifting each time quickly ).The scores are additionally the rationalization why Spike and Dixie Carter are engaged on a clean a million-hour Knockouts coach to launch in the autumn.
2016-09-30 07:16:08 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wwe is way better than tna 1. tna is not popular enough 2. tna is full of wwe regects 3. wwe raw and smackdown are two of the most popular shows on tv
2007-07-24 15:08:23 · answer #4 · answered by xxsabbybabixx 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
tna sucks but so does ecw...
raw and smackdown will always be kings...
but check this out when the rock left smackdown the ratings dropped 2 million so what does that tell ya...?
2007-07-26 00:39:08 · answer #5 · answered by CHICHARITO 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA and ECW sucks and RAW and SMACKDOWN are always going 2 be the best shows.
2007-07-26 05:11:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the story line in tna is alot better than the wwe right now
the numbers do show one side but in the end tna will win out due to its lineup not time slot
2007-07-24 10:27:37 · answer #7 · answered by bigdwg08 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
so? u want TNA to pack their bags up and leave? u know WCW kicked WWE"s butt too in the late 90;s, and if u didnt know WWE's rating have went downhill since WCW started beating him cuz of the benoit tragedy. and tna is growing they will get better for shore
2007-07-18 16:38:20 · answer #8 · answered by Billy 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Of course WWE is rated higher. Yall forget unlike WCW, most of TNA's superstars came from tne WWE. Duhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!
2007-07-18 17:30:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
SmackDown! should have higher ratings than Raw
2007-07-18 16:35:25 · answer #10 · answered by D Generation X 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The reason why WWE has more raitings because its more popular than TNA
2007-07-18 16:37:18 · answer #11 · answered by Moose 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋