Killing and maiming thousands of humans on a War of choice is not defendable. Why do you continue compounding the mistake? Why do you keep trying to blame others for your lack of compassion and insight into the relationship between War and the direct consequences in the overal degradation of the human condition?
Why do you further expose the backruptcy of your religious philosopy or lack of it?
Why support a so called President who has the habit of making decisions in the dark corners of his own mind and then never rethinking the decision when it goes absolutely wrong?
What do you possibily get out of the disaster called "The Iraq War?"
2007-07-18 16:22:53 · 10 answers · asked by zclifton2 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Seems like everyday is these days....what a ****ed up world, thank God our government doesnt have to live in it or they might actually get things done.
2007-07-18 16:27:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
A war of choice? I can only conclude that you would not consider confronting the Islamic militants and I can't understand that.
They want you and your loved ones dead - and given half a chance, they would do so in a New York minute. They would cut your damned head off just to make another video - they have slaughtered thousands of innocent people for over 25 years with pretty much impunity - and, still, when the United States finally responds - you maintain that this is a "war of choice."
You are thinking idealistically and not realistically. The terrorists are a major threat to all civilized countries - they have proven this countless times. They cannot seem to confine their blood lust to within their own borders, and this is a very serious problem. Their own government in Pakistan cannot even use diplomacy or negotiate with these militants - why do so many people think that we can?
Perhaps you might agree that if nothing else, maybe the terrorists will realize now that their tactics of indiscriminate murder will no longer be tolerated - or ignored - there will be consequences.
2007-07-18 17:04:59 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
LeAnn and Ryan, no one implies that those who are responsible for attcking us be brought to justice, we invaded a country that had little or nothing at all to do with 9-11. If we are going to invade all who train or sponsor terrorism, we need to hit Syria, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan. We have no business in Iraq. You whack jobs keep justifying this monumental screw up, when your own G.O.P leaders are saying there is no win. We have succeeded in taking Saddam down, now its time to go, the majority of Iraqis believe things will not get better until we are out.
2007-07-18 18:48:43 · answer #3 · answered by old man 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The conflict of 1812 we had no allied help and the Mexican conflict interior the early 1800's and the eastern component to WWII, and the Barbary Coast wars became right into a small conflict gained via usa on my own ( and the rationalization we gained the conflict of 1812 is with the help of the fact the only purpose we had became into to shield our borders and stop impressment of our electorate and Englands purpose became into to take decrease back the colonies which they failed at so it is considered a victory for the u . s . a .)
2016-11-09 20:45:01 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The reason you are able to ask the question you have just asked, and the reason you are able to receive this reply, are because of the very thing that you are attempting to discredit in your question. I have been there, have you? Until you see first hand the circumstances of ignoring threats to our freedoms, you cannot fully understand the impact that these threats can play on your freedoms. Your question sounds like you repeated it from a college professors mouth, and we all know how much real world experience those people have.
2007-07-18 16:35:03 · answer #5 · answered by Ryan R 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
NO!
I feel good about the war!
I feel good for all the poor people in Iraq who have had NO freedom for such a long long time, hundreds even thousands of years.
2007-07-18 16:26:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Not to me. The vote in the Senate pretty much cemented the fact that the GOP won't vote to get out of Iraq. As far as I'm concerned, it's the GOP's baby now. Today was different in that aspect.
2007-07-18 16:26:30 · answer #7 · answered by Gemini 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Yes. This thing has gotten so far out of control it's ridiculous. Excellent and well thought out question.
2007-07-18 16:29:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's better to fight people who want us dead over there then here.
2007-07-18 16:26:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
PAXIL. NOW. Then call the hotline.
2007-07-18 16:26:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋