through the foods that they export? the foods are said to have other chemicals that are not supposed to be in food.
2007-07-18 15:54:57 · 12 answers · asked by Ťango 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's a start
2007-07-18 15:58:42 · answer #1 · answered by jean 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
We should not be importing and food stuff from China... It should be manufactured right here in the USA. Poisoning the food supply is one way to make people sick and to control them. Poisoning them to death is over the top. I think China's trade policy as well as control of world ports and loaning countries money that they cannot repay is a better way of taking over the world.
2007-07-18 23:07:26 · answer #2 · answered by Todd Maz 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think China's way of taking over the world is to invest in infrastructure and in education and to strike a balance between a centrally controlled economy and private companies. China is focused on growth.
Compare that to the Reagan/Bush efforts to simply channel more wealth into the hands of the wealthiest. And America is accumulating huge debt on a dead-end war. That's money that could be spent maintaining and growing infrastructure.
The Republican Party: Leading America ... into the 19th century.
2007-07-18 23:09:12 · answer #3 · answered by frugernity 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think that is the least of all things we have to worry about China..but we do have to worry about China. Many believe they have a hidden agenda and they have definitely become a world power who can compete both technologically with the US and militarily. Russia seems to be reverting back to it's old ways also...they are the ones to watch. They will sit back and watch our country turn on ourselves and then when they deem us as weakened...watch out. Why do you think they are never trying to help in the global war on terror?
2007-07-18 23:04:32 · answer #4 · answered by jbbrant1 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If they miss you with food, they'll get you when you brush. They also do some funny things with pharmaceuticals so say the media. Do you know why they're after the animals too?
2007-07-18 23:03:22 · answer #5 · answered by gerlad m 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I will get Jack Bauer on the case!!!!
2007-07-18 22:59:02 · answer #6 · answered by jw 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Maybe or else grossly incompetent!
2007-07-18 23:03:19 · answer #7 · answered by Constitutional Watchdog 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No.Too complicated.
2007-07-18 22:58:58 · answer #8 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yeah sure, thats why the guy responsible was executed almost immediately! Duh! You can call the punishment harsh, but it certainly isn't an endorsement of what happened. What kind of message does that send to his sucessor?
2007-07-18 22:57:44 · answer #9 · answered by booman17 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
well yea that does seem to be the case huh?!?!?
2007-07-18 23:07:57 · answer #10 · answered by boricua_lilly 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋