Plame Outing Flowchart (PDF)
http://oversight.house.gov/documents/20070316173308-19288.pdf
2007-07-18 15:47:34 · 5 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
booman (below) Incorrect. The law states that one must be aware that the person is covert when outing them.
It states that you can not be convicted of treason if you found out afterward that the person was covert. Fizt could not prove that they knew BEFORE doing it.
2007-07-18 16:04:55 · update #1
Here's the deal, and regardless of what you think politically. The most serious charge that could have been brought would have been the outing of a covert spy. Yet, that didn't happen. Ask yourself why? Because she was not covert as defined by the applicable law and Fitzpatrick knew it. So, you have an investigation in which there was no crime until one was created in the investigation....Nice!
2007-07-18 15:50:47 · answer #1 · answered by booman17 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No. Only feeble-minded right-wing moonbats still believe and respect Dick "Iraq will be a cakewalk" Cheney.
2007-07-18 16:13:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A rational person would have checked his facts before jumping to (inaccurate) conclusions. You seem to have failed your own test.
2007-07-18 15:55:56 · answer #3 · answered by Ron S 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wait, according to that Armitage outted himself. So.....how is this anyone elses FAULT?
2007-07-18 15:53:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
still on the Plame thing ahy.
2007-07-18 15:52:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋