passion of the christ movie?

Question

who enjoyed the passion of the christ movie that mel gibson directed? i did, but i thought it was pretty gruesome

Answer 1

Obviously there are some people who are rather ignorant about the words they use and what the Passion of the Christ actually is supposed to be. The one user who said "There is nothing passionate about this movie" obviously did not research the meaning of the word Passion. The English word has its roots in the Latin passio, which means, simply, "suffering."

A search on "Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary" turns up:

PASSION: \Pas"sion\, v. i. To suffer pain or sorrow; to experience a passion; to be extremely agitated.

People also seem upset that this movie did not portray the times in Jesus' life when he was deep in ministry. The Passion of the Christ is a centuries old tradition. I recently visited Oberammergau, Germany and saw the site of the Passion Play that has been performed every decade since 1634. The Passion Play ONLY portrays the suffering of Christ. It is meant to bring the what Christ did for our sins to the forefront.

Anyways, The second the movie was over, I was dumbstruck, and I wasn't the only one. When the movie ended I thought there would be a big round of applause but when I turned around I saw that about half the audience was still in their seats. I looked at a couple of people, some were speachless and most were crying. Nonetheless I didn't hear a word. When I thought about it, i realized an applause would have been ridiculous.

When someone asked me how the movie was I was going to say it was amazing, but that wouldn't have done the movie justice. The movie was an extremely moving, emotional experience.

Everything people are saying about the violence is true. It is brutal, gory, and quite possibly the most violent work in cinematic history. This R-Rating is very well justified and an NC-17 would have made sense. If you are the type of person that cannot bear violence, this is definately not the movie for you. Some scenes of torture last about 10 minutes when you feel you've seen enough after 30 seconds. But, the violence I feel was absolutely necessary. The movie is about the suffering/passion of Jesus, and turning the camera away would not have an impact on you. The movie shows what Jesus actually went through for all of mankind's sins (according to Christianity). Mel Gibson did not exagerate the violence or make it look like horror movie or Kill Bill violence. As Jay Leno said on his show the other night, when Jesus was hit it felt like WE were being hit as opposed to other violent movies were you feel like YOU are the one hitting the person. I don't think anyone can say that every single hit upon Jesus didn't affect him/her somehow.

All in all, Perhaps the film's greatest impact has been to get me to pick up the Bible again, and do so with a new faith and understanding. And for that Gibson deserves nothing but praise.

Answer 2

When i first saw the movie, it really moved me with tears. Most people who saw the movie did not find any meaningful messages of redemption. But for me, it does.

Answer 3

If you believe, as Mel Gibson does, that the Jews are responsible for Jesus Christ's death, then maybe the film makes sense.

I don't mean to be flippant about it, but you have to look at the film as you would any piece of art and consider - what was the artist's motivation? What was the artist hoping to communicate?

When the film was released, a lot of critics came to Gibson's defense and said the film wasn't anti-Semetic. However, in the original print, an untranslated statement by a Jew that "his blood is upon us and our children" is more commonly known as the "blood libel," a vile excuse used for centuries by anti-Semites to oppress Jews.

I think its pretty obvious that Gibson is a closeted anti-Semite (as is his father, who is actually much more open about his contempt for the Jews) as his drunken tirade attests. How many interviews did he give prior to his DUI arrest where he stated emphatically that he was not an anti-Semite?

Religions are morally and intellectually bankrupt. I think Mel Gibson is a good (recent) example of why this is so.

If its sado-masochism in the name of religion that people enjoy, I highly recommend Ken Russell's film, "The Devils." It's much more historically accurate with respect to the nature of the Church.

Answer 4

As salaamu 'alaikym. Insha'Allah, the movie is supposedly a protrayal of the Prophet Isa/Jesus ('alaihi sallam) and the prophets hould not be protrayed in such a ammner or in any manner of pictorial representations. It also has music, incorrect language Isa (as) would have spoken Aramaic but Mel isn't so hot on real history, I mean look what he did to William Wallace...), graphic violence and I don't think it will make you think of Allah, Subhanna wa Ta'ala as you watch it. It is haram. Ma'a salaam

Answer 5

I did. Very moving, and a good realization of the sacrifice the Lord made for me.

Answer 6

I loved it, except all the folks crying in the theater. A good point though is that nobody used a laser to point at a crotch or boob.

Answer 7

Yeah I thought it was a good movie.

Answer 8

It was an awesome movie and I am so grateful for the sacrifice that was made for me.

Answer 9

I loved it but it made me cry..There are some scenes that I just can not bare to watch.

Answer 10

it's about what Jesus did and an understanding , was never meant to be a thing to enjoy..