The Busheviks like to reduce the War on Terror to its simplest possible terms: are we winning or are the terrorists?
How many times have they (especially Bush, Cheney, & Tony Snow) attacked Democrats for taking some action that will "help the terrorists?"
Well now it's official: the terrorists are winning.
Bush Aides See Failure in Fight With Al Qaeda in Pakistan
President Bush’s top counterterrorism advisers acknowledged Tuesday that the strategy for fighting Osama bin Laden’s leadership of Al Qaeda in Pakistan had failed, as the White House released a grim new intelligence assessment that has forced the administration to consider more aggressive measures inside Pakistan.
Bush is Losing and the Terrorists are Winning...
Oh wait...
ALL the terrorists are INSIDE Iraq...
Right Republicans?
2007-07-18 13:48:25 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Bush has nothing to Smart to say because I don't think he or his team knows what they are doing? Republicans now are starting to see that so that is why a lot of them are starting to disagree with President Bush; but for a lot of families it is much to late because there loved one perished over a war that makes absolutely no sense at all. I don't know how we actually got involved with Iraq. We first started off in Afghanistan trying to get Osama Bin Landen and his team for them attacking us on September 11, 2001 and hurting us the way they did. President Bush lost that war and started another war and forgot the reason we went to war was to find the man that hurt us on September 11.
2007-07-18 14:03:52 · answer #1 · answered by GDJS 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Your delusions are basically surpassed by way of your idiocy. Obama isn't certain to win. in case you knew something approximately approval rankings, you will possibly understand the pollsters ask ambiguous questions like "Do you think of the President cares approximately you?" or "Do you think of the President is a kinfolk guy?" and the "sure" solutions equivalent approval. the main telling information are offered by way of the nearby polls on the state point. Romney is maximum suitable the polls in all yet 2 of the swing states, and in those 2 states it particularly is a ineffective-warmth between Romney and Obama. If Obama wins (and that's a good sized IF), it particularly is going to be very close.
2016-10-09 00:51:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When you listen to the Democrats they will tel you that we are loosing this war. But when you talk to the troops they will tel you that we are winning. Bush and Cheney both have both been over there and talked to the troops. They are both getting daily reports. The democrats are getting the same reports but they don't read them. No we are not loosing we are winning. True we have lost 3,600 men over the past five years; when you compare that with the other wars we been in we lost more than that in one day. The enemy is loosing allot more men than we are in every battle that we have. But their loses are not reported to the American ppeople. Not only that the Iraqi eople are turning the terrorist in to our troops. Plus the Democrats and the media will do anything to under mind this President. They did the same thing to Nixon in Nam. They even call Vietnam Nixon's war. Which is not true it was L.B.J's war. The only time Democrats started to under mind the Commander in Chief was when the Commander in Chief became a Republican.
2007-07-18 14:19:40 · answer #3 · answered by DALE M 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Most Republicans are much smarter then GW and they do realize we have a real mess. They seem to want to give GW as much time as possible, to win his war, which boggles the mind. I think Republicans also want a resolution, but not one written by the Democrats, so they can save face, so to speak. I just wish this whole mess would get resolved, without all the darn politics. We have lost so much already. And I do wish GW would get out of "La La Land" and listen to his advisors and then some.
2007-07-18 13:59:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
The terrorists have gained a small amount of ground in one small area. But that doesn't mean they're winning the whole war. We are, as much as that may disappoint liberals.
2007-07-18 14:42:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why do not you face it ...there has not been any attacks on our soil since 9-11.
I wonder if those darned Demon-cats would have had the same record if they had won the election back then ..you know?
Oh running and hiding under your skirts (United Nations) ... how many times must you be slapped in the face?
2007-07-18 14:02:38 · answer #6 · answered by gassniffer 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Maybe he wouldn't be "failing" if Repubs and Dems would stop fighting like divorced parents, not really caring about their kids, just that THEY have to be RIGHT about everything. Terrorists aren't going to stop trying to kill us until we get our act together and start working together as a nation. Seriously, united we stand people....
2007-07-18 13:57:38 · answer #7 · answered by Roland'sMommy 6 · 6⤊ 1⤋
yes, i think they realise it, but i really believe Bush is too bull-headed to admit he was wrong and most of the republicans in congress are either too scared to go against the party line or too bull-headed to admit defeat as well. it'll be interesting to see what happens after bush leaves
2007-07-18 14:01:37 · answer #8 · answered by dudrich 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The largest, most deadliest attack happened under Bush's watch AND Al Qaida's stronger than ever. What do Bushies have to say about this? "Yay, Bush--we weren't attacked AGAIN at least!!!!!" Sickos!!!!!
2007-07-18 13:54:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Oh wait...
ALL the terrorists are INSIDE Iraq...
Right Republicans?
Actually, many of them are in Washington DC. Most of them were elected in November.
2007-07-18 13:53:56 · answer #10 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋