My roommate and I are moving out of our 2/2 apartment, just built in 2005 (we are the first and only tenants thus far). I recently found out that our lease says that we're responsible for getting the carpet professionally cleaned (no do-it-yourself Rug Doctor) before we move out. I had no idea about this until now. We're never home and have no furniture in the living areas, so the carpets are IMMACULATE -- no stains, odors, matting, anything. The bedrooms have no stains or damage-- just normal wear and tear, and even that's stretching it. Do you think they would reconsider this provision after agreeing to take a look at the apartment and seeing it's in pristine condition?? It would be a total waste of $200 to have a company come out. I'd much rather pay $20 and rent a Rug Doctor for a few hours. Any experiences, advice would be appreciated! =)
2007-07-18
12:34:24
·
5 answers
·
asked by
lmw_315
1
in
Business & Finance
➔ Renting & Real Estate
I did read the lease, but by the end of signing 20-something pages, I definitely wasn't paying as close attention as I should have. You live, you learn, right?
So let's say I did notice the carpet-cleaning provision looking over the lease: what could have done? Asked them to remove it? Asked that they edit the provision so that I'd only have to have the carpets cleaned if both parties deemed it necessary?
I've been a tenant at a couple different apartment complexes, and this is the only place that's required that the tenant be held responsible for carpet cleaning.
2007-07-18
13:06:32 ·
update #1