Hillary is the most qualified, but Barak has many fresh ideas. I think it's the best combo.
2007-07-18 10:47:25 · 21 answers · asked by mstrywmn 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Read this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19762038/site/newsweek/
2007-07-18 11:00:47 · update #1
it sounds good to me. As long as Healthcare is top priority. Anything to keep the Republicans from getting in is good to me.
2007-07-23 10:56:09 · answer #1 · answered by roundman84 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama should not tarnish His image by getting involved with Hillary. It is better to wait until 2012 and win than catch the negative image that Hillary carries.
2007-07-18 21:33:47 · answer #2 · answered by old codger 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Obviously you watch TV and cannot think for yourself.
Thinking and intelligent people that believe in freedom and personal responsibility support Ron Paul. I admit there are many highly qualified and intelligent people who will not support Ron Paul because they believe our leaders know best and should make most of the decision for us. In other words, they believe that most people will make poor choices and need the direction and guidance of the government.
2007-07-20 18:49:26 · answer #3 · answered by John 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Give me Obama and not Hillary Clinton.
I am tired of Clinton and Bush puppy chow.
Clinton has not sponsored any real legislation and only flip flops less than George Bush.
She does not have experience more than Barack.
He has more years of elected experience than she does. Give it a break from Bush and Clinton.
Game over for those two families.
2007-07-18 17:53:48 · answer #4 · answered by hello T 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Not much. No chance to win.
Why do people talk about Hillary as qualified? Name one piece of significant legislation she authored while in Senate.
Her own Party trashed her Universal health Care Plan.
So, whats up with that?
2007-07-18 17:55:49 · answer #5 · answered by Ken C 6 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Yes.
Hillary is a Communist.
But not as big of a Communist as Mohamed Obama Hussein Barack.
He is one of the most Communist in the Senate.
But he is a little Muslim Twit.
I think Hillary should just be honest and pick Kim Jong Ill.
GO HILLARY!!!!!!!
2007-07-18 18:10:45 · answer #6 · answered by wolf 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
I'd be more in favor of an Obama-Clinton team. Hillary has more experience, but I don't think that makes her more qualified. She's much more effective behind the scenes, than as a face.
2007-07-18 18:03:20 · answer #7 · answered by Beardog 7 · 1⤊ 7⤋
I agree 100 percent and I hope this is how is pans out. I don't think Obama has enough experience to be the head honcho yet, but give him 8 years next to Clinton and he'll be ready.
2007-07-18 17:56:50 · answer #8 · answered by Rahrah 4 · 2⤊ 6⤋
BWAAAAH HAAAAH!!!!! HILLARY IS MOST QUALIFIED???ARE YOU SERIOUS...??? i think anything involving hillary would bring us eight more years of the clinton white house legacy and god why would you want any more of that?
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
2007-07-18 17:56:17 · answer #9 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 7⤊ 5⤋
Edwards/Obama would be far better. Hillary stinks.
2007-07-18 17:53:27 · answer #10 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 5⤊ 6⤋